Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nextel,alt.cellular.verizon (
More info?)
Not sure what NEXTEL you are using. I've been using Nextel for 6 years and
have yet to get a busy signal or standby when using direct connect. As for
the User Not Available message, how is it Nextel's fault if the person being
called is already talking to someone else?
"Jimmy D" <james@anon.com> wrote in message
news
😀qnue.9377$Wb.8506@trndny03...
> However you have to hope that your NEXTEL works when you need it. It's a
> very poor antiquated system . They are overloaded with Boost Mobile.
Funny
> thing happened today for example. I was sitting right next to a current
> Nextel user. I'm sure you are extremely aware of the annoying Nextel
noise
> that the phone makes when the system is screwed up and you can't get
> through. Well there I am just PTT away with my new Verizon VX4700. The
> call was going through just smoothly as it has the last four days that I
had
> it activated. No busy signals! No User Not Available messages. No stand
by
> while the Nextel user your trying to reach is located. I'm sure all you
> Nextel users all heard that before! My calls just go right on through the
> way a service that I am paying for should. I am very sure that there is
> going to be a big pile of JUNK NEXTEL'S somewhere soon. Just wait till
> Verizon starts the advertising campaign again. LOL!!!
>
>
> "SS" <nospam1336479852@wopdj.net> wrote in message
> news:iPGdnSE0ff9NWyXfRVn-pw@adelphia.com...
> >
> > "Larry W4CSC" <noone@home.com> wrote in message
> > news:Xns967CCA25296Dw4csc@63.223.7.253...
> >> "Jimmie James" <james@james.com> wrote in
> > news:eNKte.5577$R6.5255@trndny04:
> >>
> >> > CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW!!! 2 Thumbs Up for Verizon!!!
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> One more question....please.
> >>
> >> Why would anyone, on any company, use a PTT walkie talkie, even if it
> >> worked perfect, holding a perfectly-great-working FULL DUPLEX telephone
> >> in
> >> their hands with a built-in speakerphone?? Is this some kind of retro
> >> novelty or trend-setting statement?
> >>
> >> I've been using PTT on ham and 2-way radios since 1957. I was 11, by
the
> >> way. I don't see why anyone would want to use it...
> >>
> >
> > Try this- you need to contact an associate to get numbers for a
> > presentation
> > and you are not at your desk. You contact your associate (who is also
not
> > at
> > his desk) and he says he'll get them for you as soon as he returns.
Once
> > at
> > his desk, he contacts you to get specifics and contacts you an hour
later
> > with the numbers.
> >
> > In the cellular world, you have each burned a minimum of 4 minutes of
call
> > time to accomplish this simple task. Multiply this by a fair number of
> > these calls a month and you have effectively burned through most of your
> > plan minutes. Last I knew, Nextel billed PTT in 6 second increments,
> > which
> > means that the 4 minutes of cellular could be as little as 1 minute of
PTT
> > time or less. Much more cost effective.
> >
> > Now, take the same situation, except that your associate is at his desk
> > and
> > you need the numbers absolutely ASAP. He takes the time to find the
> > numbers
> > while you wait.
> >
> > In the cellular world, you are again spending minutes, only this time
most
> > of them are spent on an unproductive hold. With PTT, your phone is only
> > tied up and billed when you are actually using it.
> >
> > Finally, take the scenario a step further and you have to report the
> > numbers
> > to a group of company executives (remember, you are not at your desk).
In
> > the cellular world, you can make a number of individual calls to convey
> > the
> > information. With PTT, you can make a single announcement.
> >
> > Despite your own lack of understanding of the efficiencies, it is
actually
> > a
> > very effective tool in the business world. The fact that the technology
> > is
> > not cutting edge has no bearing on its usefullness.
> >
> >
>
>