The_Blood_Raven
Distinguished
[citation][nom]septagent[/nom]@The_Blood_RavenI think you missed the introduction. A good majority of us would much rather provide a high end gaming machine to a friend WITHOUT having to provide the support for years. We have other jobs and plenty of things to do. In my case, the machines like this that i have tried to provide for friends were hundreds of miles away. When they have a major issue and lose a power supply or something, It's a pain to have to arrange a trip (or make them wait for a trip) up there to take care of it. It would be nice to be able to recommend a high end machine with full support and only a few hundred bucks more. Sounds selfish, but the amount of free service it would take for me to travel 150 miles to replace a power supply (or MOBO, or anything else) is worth much more than $400 you might save in parts. It would be worth it on just one trip, let alone 2 or 3 that might be necessary over the years. I think it's totally appropriate to recommend a vendor like this.[/citation]
Again I'm not disagreeing with the article, just stating that the price they listed for support is higher. If you want this kind of support than it is a great deal. But as I said in my first post, I don't understand the conclusion. You CAN build a similar or faster PC with different components, they based their $250 figure off of the retail price for the exact same parts, for less money than even that I configured a faster PC. I just feel they have a hole in their logic that makes the conclusion useless.
Again I'm not disagreeing with the article, just stating that the price they listed for support is higher. If you want this kind of support than it is a great deal. But as I said in my first post, I don't understand the conclusion. You CAN build a similar or faster PC with different components, they based their $250 figure off of the retail price for the exact same parts, for less money than even that I configured a faster PC. I just feel they have a hole in their logic that makes the conclusion useless.