[citation][nom]it3113ktu4l_pr0p3r-T[/nom]One of 3 things is at play here, either: it's running an ARM CPU emulating x86, which will be slow, it's running an atom underclocked to 100mhz to fit in a phone power envelope, which is still slow, or they've compiled Windows XP for ARM, in which case I say: Congratulations, idiots, there are now going to be ARM powered PC's running XP, Intel's going to pitch a fit because you just screwed up the joint Wintel monopoly racket. If Intel can no longer muscle people out of the PC market with their IP, then you won't be able to either...[/citation]If you read the article, you'll realize it is an AMD x86 chip, likely a very low power K8-derived chip.
Also a couple of things to note: This is not a Microsoft phone. How exactly is a third party company going to toss together a version of WinXP embedded for ARM, when they don't have the source?
Furthermore, an ARM version of an outdated version of Windows wouldn't break up your supposed (doesn't exist) Wintel monopoly (there's Linux, Mac, and others, and Intel isn't the only x86 chipmaker, people buy them for a reason - and I'm an AMD fan more than Intel). Why? The ARM version would only run software specifically made for the ARM version of WinXP. In other words, nothing we can run on regular WinXP would run unless it was ported over first.
Here's another example: Windows for Itanium. That's right, MS ported a version of Windows to the Itanium architecture. Guess what? There's hardly any software for it, and the Itanium is almost dead.