The WinRAR benchmark

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
A

addiarmadar

Distinguished
May 26, 2003
2,558
0
20,780
I know that there was a post for this somewhere here but I cannot find it. I tried the benchmark and Scored 350kbs. What have you all gotten with your rigs? Need a base of comparison. Thanks...

Barton 2500+ @ 2200mhz (10x220 vcore @ 1.8)
Asus A7N8X Dlx 440 FSB
1gb Geil GD pc3500 Dual Channel (2-3-3-6)
Segata 80gb SATA 8.5ms seek
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro(420/720)
 
<b><A HREF="http://www.geocities.com/spitfire_x86/thgc/rarbench.html" target="_new">Here's THGC WinRAR benchmark chart</A></b>. Currently <b>gothitbycar</b> is leading the chart with 503 kb/s (Athlon64 3200+)

Your score isn't added yet. I will update chart daily.

----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>
 
64bit platforms definately has the advantage since they can do double of wat 32bit platforms can. Since I see that I smoked a legit Athlon XP 3200 then my score rocks for my abused 2500.

Barton 2500+ @ 2200mhz (10x220 vcore @ 1.8)
Asus A7N8X Dlx 440 FSB
1gb Geil GD pc3500 Dual Channel (2-3-3-6)
Segata 80gb SATA 8.5ms seek
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro(420/720)
 
64bit platforms definately has the advantage since they can do double of wat 32bit platforms can.
Click to expand...

Ummm... no.

The OS and application have to support 64-Bit before it will have ANY effect on performance.

<font color=red> If you design software that is fool-proof, only a fool will want to use it. </font color=red>
 
Memory latency plays a big role in this benchmark. When I used 2.5-3-3-6 instead of 2.0-2-2-5, I got 7.14% lower score.

Athlon64/Opterons are performing great because of their on-die memory controller. This is purely 32 bit application and I think 64 bit will give some performance boost in this kind of apps.

----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>
 
229Kbps, but I may get that a bit higher by dropping my memory latencies (they will work lower in everything apart from CoD, very annoying):

1700+ at 2600+ (166x12.5)
MSI 745 Ultra
512MB PC2700 2.5-3-3-6
Geforce 4 Ti4200
WD 80GB SE

<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7454540" target="_new">Yay, I Finally broke the 12k barrier!!</A>
 
you might as well put me down on there for 207 aswell

not sure what it is that is slowing things down here.

<b>on the verge of catastrophy (y1.999...k)</b>
ASUS P4S8X - P4 2.4B - 2 x 512M DDR333 - ATI 9500 Pro - WD 80G HD(8M) - SAMSUNG SV0844D 8G HD - LG 16X DVD - Yamaha F1 CDRW
 
Ok, just rebooted at 2.5-2-2-5 and got 248Kbps. I think your right Spitfire, memory latency does make a big difference. I think the memory controller does too, since it seems my SiS745 and 2600+ isnt as fast as a lot of the nforce2's with much slower processors. Also if the P3's are on BX platforms theyre likely to score quite high due to the very efficient chipset design.

<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7454540" target="_new">Yay, I Finally broke the 12k barrier!!</A>
 
you see that ain right!

I have the same system as boilermaker there...

how do i find out my latency on my ram? btw my chipset is sis648 socket 478

<b>on the verge of catastrophy (y1.999...k)</b>
ASUS P4S8X - P4 2.4B - 2 x 512M DDR333 - ATI 9500 Pro - WD 80G HD(8M) - SAMSUNG SV0844D 8G HD - LG 16X DVD - Yamaha F1 CDRW
 
Screen shot to prove it Mr. AMD pants :tongue: .

-taitertot

If this post has attitude, seems to be overly aggressive, rude, distasteful to 99% of the users here, and shows a zealous defense of Intel... It’s probably Spud.
 
I do not beleive CPU-Z to ID your chip :tongue: .

-taitertot

If this post has attitude, seems to be overly aggressive, rude, distasteful to 99% of the users here, and shows a zealous defense of Intel... It’s probably Spud.
 
I did some math for you taitertot

Jim552's Operton 242 gets 412 points @ 1.6ghz this means:
every 3.88mhz = 1 point
My A64 3200+ gets 503 points @ 2ghz, therefore:
3.97mhz = 1 point

That pretty much shows perfect scaling.

-----------------------
[mind went blank]
 
Jim's Opteron surely has ECC memory, which is hurting scores little. And he hasn't told that he was running DDR400, his socre may be with DDR333, since ECC DDR400 is very expensive

----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>
 
maybe your sis648 isn't that good, or you may tighten up memory timing?

----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>
 
it would be good if you let us know your memory timing

----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>
 
it's CAS 2. I forget what the rest is, I *think* it's 2-3-3-7 or something along those lines. I had it at 2-2-2-5 for awhile, but went back to default.
 
There should be a chart of all benchmark.
Hoh and if you want to adjust the chart i now get 324 with my memory at 3-3-3-2

My own beast: Athlon 2700xp+ (oc: 3200xp+ with 200fsb) , Radeon 9800pro (oc: 410/370) , 512mb ddr400. SO MUCH faster than my last computer (pIII 550......)<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by coylter on 01/30/04 01:20 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom