- Status
RememberThe5th
Illustrious
- Jul 30, 2014
- 6,995
- 170
- 41,140
RememberThe5th
Illustrious
- Jul 30, 2014
- 6,995
- 170
- 41,140
As it sound crazy as it is, with my GA-EP45-UD3R on E5800 I was pushing 1.55V 4.5GHz and 2.4V? on DDR2 ram XD
Have you used LLC on 5.3GHz OC?
Have you used LLC on 5.3GHz OC?
RememberThe5th
Illustrious
- Jul 30, 2014
- 6,995
- 170
- 41,140
RememberThe5th
Illustrious
- Jul 30, 2014
- 6,995
- 170
- 41,140
RememberThe5th
Illustrious
- Jul 30, 2014
- 6,995
- 170
- 41,140
- Nov 13, 2006
- 6,375
- 284
- 38,240
RememberThe5th
Illustrious
- Jul 30, 2014
- 6,995
- 170
- 41,140
Weird 100ish points for 100Mhz oc
Try with setting ram to 2133 , i wanna see difference (if you will).
Try with setting ram to 2133 , i wanna see difference (if you will).
Hi all,
Minor update of total result with small decrease in one core performance:
Changes:
- CL10 instead of CL13 on memory
- 104 mhz on blck instead of 104.5 [due to nvme driver which simply does not work correctly over 104]
- cpu undervolting which gives better ratio on all cores (35x instead of 33-34x)
Minor update of total result with small decrease in one core performance:
Changes:
- CL10 instead of CL13 on memory
- 104 mhz on blck instead of 104.5 [due to nvme driver which simply does not work correctly over 104]
- cpu undervolting which gives better ratio on all cores (35x instead of 33-34x)
So it took going to 4x8 ram in order for me to figure out the 2700x overclocking. I cleared cmos and started much simpler just OC on bclk and multipler, 103.4 and 41.75 volts 1.41 soc 1.15. Ram is at 3333MHz 14-14-14-30 @1.45. Sniper x rated at 3400. I could get the ram to 3533 at the same timings with 2 dimms, 4 took awhile to find the right speed with the cl14 timings. I left the other settings on Auto that I originally was messing with. Apparently a Crosshair Vii/2700x combo can figure out the rest and give better OC's.
- Oct 6, 2015
- 712
- 0
- 5,010
Sorry for not posting for a while, been super busy with real life. These dragons are really bothersome.
Table has been updated, although I may have accidentally deleted some valid entries. Lemme know if you think yours is missing.
@Eximo I find it funny that my 4790K is still invincible to 7700Ks. It's almost like there was no IPC improvement in Kaby- and Skylake since Haswell. I mean Haswell is just improved 22nm Ivy Bridge.
@Xeon_fan
Give these timings a try. They are stable for up to 2133mhz.
@Jankerson Intel just slapped 4 extra cores on an Ivy Bridge CPU, 9900K is a waste IMO. AMD would probably have the better 8-core performance...I mean look at the table once I update it lol
@markuaw1 please don't spam
@sr13798 Try smaller DIMMS, 4GB each if you can, the less addressable space you have the less the CPU needs to be aware of, increasing performance a little. I'd run 8x 4gb sticks in my rig if they fit, but I have to settle for 8Gb per channel at 32gb total, 4x4gb and 2x 8gb quad channel
@CompuTronix please resubmit your image, it's too small and I can't read some of the CPU-Z info
Table has been updated, although I may have accidentally deleted some valid entries. Lemme know if you think yours is missing.
@Eximo I find it funny that my 4790K is still invincible to 7700Ks. It's almost like there was no IPC improvement in Kaby- and Skylake since Haswell. I mean Haswell is just improved 22nm Ivy Bridge.
@Xeon_fan
Give these timings a try. They are stable for up to 2133mhz.
@Jankerson Intel just slapped 4 extra cores on an Ivy Bridge CPU, 9900K is a waste IMO. AMD would probably have the better 8-core performance...I mean look at the table once I update it lol
@markuaw1 please don't spam
@sr13798 Try smaller DIMMS, 4GB each if you can, the less addressable space you have the less the CPU needs to be aware of, increasing performance a little. I'd run 8x 4gb sticks in my rig if they fit, but I have to settle for 8Gb per channel at 32gb total, 4x4gb and 2x 8gb quad channel
@CompuTronix please resubmit your image, it's too small and I can't read some of the CPU-Z info
- Sep 10, 2006
- 7,884
- 140
- 37,390
EquineHero :
Sorry for not posting for a while, been super busy with real life. These dragons are really bothersome.
Table has been updated, although I may have accidentally deleted some valid entries. Lemme know if you think yours is missing.
@Eximo I find it funny that my 4790K is still invincible to 7700Ks. It's almost like there was no IPC improvement in Kaby- and Skylake since Haswell. I mean Haswell is just improved 22nm Ivy Bridge.
@Xeon_fan
Give these timings a try. They are stable for up to 2133mhz.
@Jankerson Intel just slapped 4 extra cores on an Ivy Bridge CPU, 9900K is a waste IMO. AMD would probably have the better 8-core performance...I mean look at the table once I update it lol
@markuaw1 please don't spam
@sr13798 Try smaller DIMMS, 4GB each if you can, the less addressable space you have the less the CPU needs to be aware of, increasing performance a little. I'd run 8x 4gb sticks in my rig if they fit, but I have to settle for 8Gb per channel at 32gb total, 4x4gb and 2x 8gb quad channel
@CompuTronix please resubmit your image, it's too small and I can't read some of the CPU-Z info
Table has been updated, although I may have accidentally deleted some valid entries. Lemme know if you think yours is missing.
@Eximo I find it funny that my 4790K is still invincible to 7700Ks. It's almost like there was no IPC improvement in Kaby- and Skylake since Haswell. I mean Haswell is just improved 22nm Ivy Bridge.
@Xeon_fan
Give these timings a try. They are stable for up to 2133mhz.
@Jankerson Intel just slapped 4 extra cores on an Ivy Bridge CPU, 9900K is a waste IMO. AMD would probably have the better 8-core performance...I mean look at the table once I update it lol
@markuaw1 please don't spam
@sr13798 Try smaller DIMMS, 4GB each if you can, the less addressable space you have the less the CPU needs to be aware of, increasing performance a little. I'd run 8x 4gb sticks in my rig if they fit, but I have to settle for 8Gb per channel at 32gb total, 4x4gb and 2x 8gb quad channel
@CompuTronix please resubmit your image, it's too small and I can't read some of the CPU-Z info
My 9900K score should be in 3rd place with 20,706.
And sr1379's 2700X score should be in 5th with 20,001
Not 6th and 7th....
- Oct 6, 2015
- 712
- 0
- 5,010
My bad, long day. No coffee or energy drinks, haven't had a chance to grab one. Just sat down at my desk at home and checked Tom's. I had 10 PMs, is this what it's like t o be popular?
Table will be u[strike]pdated[/strike] fixed shortly.
- Status
TRENDING THREADS
-
News AMD says Intel's 'horrible product' is causing Ryzen 9 9800X3D shortages- Started by Admin
- Replies: 76
-
-
Question Just bought a RX 7800XT and at current bus it says it runs on PCI EXPRESS 3.0- Started by fasadasa
- Replies: 7
-
-
-
Discussion PSU recommendations and power supply discussion thread - Tom's hardware- Started by Darkbreeze
- Replies: 2K
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram