Sagittariusss
Reputable
TechyInAZ :
Sagittariusss :
TechyInAZ :
Sagittariusss :
Wait, how's the i5 4690K is worst than the I5-6400? doesnt makes any sense at all. Quick google research on reviews and figured out the i5 4690k is better in cpu-intensive games.
Simple, core clock. Haswell's performance compared to Skylake isn't that significant at all. Plus, add in the 6400s really low core clock compared to a 4690k at a high overclock, and the 4690k will always win.
if the i5-6400 was overclockable could we overclock it that much? maybe, but we can overclock the i5 4690k aswell. Basically you said, the i5 4690k is better than the i5-6400, and i still dont know why in your chart it is worst.
#edit thought you post was about bottlenecking and not about power effiency per fps.
Which specific chart are u talking about? Cause that's a typo of I said the 4690k is worse than the 6400.
The 6400 is actually overclockable, but you have to use BCLK which won't get you far at all. I can imagine you'd top out at 3.2ghzish.
So how the i5 4690k would bottleneck more if at any application the i5 6400 is worst than it? I'm talking about this chart http://