Unigine Valley 1.0 Benchmark Thread

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
It strange your score are lower thant mine....

could u try diffrent O.C setting....

When I tried Heaven 4.0 with mem at 1300 it give me score about ~730
when i push the mem to 1400 (stable) the score drop to ~700
it could be the same thing happen....
 
I don't think its a CPU bottleneck, especially because we're dealing with benchmarks that are mostly single-threaded and only use (in my case) about 25% of the CPU.

Something is at play here. Nitrium, can you run GPU-Z and click on the PCIe button and verify that you are running at least PCIe x8/x16?

Your score is about 60% of what it should be.

Earlier today I would run the bench and only get about 37FPS and it was having the iGPU in Multi-Monitor mode in BIOS that was holding me back but Lynnfield doesn't have an iGPU so that can't be the case unless your mobo has integrated graphics. What is the make and model of your mobo?
 
I just ran 3DMark (the new one). This also shows the mobo/RAM etc. The CPU processor clock is obviously wrong - it's 3.4 GHz.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/243170
3_DMark_Stock.jpg

That seems ok to me from other scores I've seen.
 


Yeah I had one of those. Click the button on the side of the GPU to turn the boost BIOS off (the blue LED should no longer be lit up, you will have to reboot for it to take effect). I had trouble with the boost BIOS. Then manually clock it to the BOOST values. Should be 950/1375 @ 1.175v, power slider +20%. Then click that "?" mark on GPU-Z and it will run a little test to put the GPU under stress and it will tell you if it is working at x16.
 



I was wondering why the score was like half of mines. IRL i was like, there's no way a 285 would be THAT low. then after^^ post came, it all made sense.
 

Ill be upgrading soon :)
 
Why I went sli, no more dumps on my system. This benchmark runs extremely well tbh as opposed to some on a good card. A new gpu, even mid ranged will run alot better. A little over 200 bux can get a good mid ranged card that can run this bench well, as well as all the latest dx11 titles.
 


I followed those instructions, except I set power slider to +10% - maxing it out seemed kinda wrong to me.

nitrium - i5 760 @ 3.4GHz - HD7950 @ 950/1375 - 32.8 - 1374
Vally_Benchmark_Stock3.jpg


WOW! Thanks very much for the tip!
 


beat me by a point will you?!? :lol:
uniginevalleybench.jpg



i certainly hope you won't let this big mouthed green team fan run his mouth that GTX 570 > HD7950 now will you [:rayner428]

(jk, its all in good fun)
 

Datz gr8 a 200mhz oc on that fermi,especially the shader clock turning the tides for you and I was about to forget the remarkable oc scaling of fermi cards. 😛
Here's wat my 660 ti power edition is posting
valley.png

 


Pfffft. I have had a Riva 128, a Riva TNT, a Riva TNT2, a Geforce, a Geforce 2, a Geforce 4200Ti, a 6600GT, a 8800GTS, and a GTX260. Can you say the same, so called "Green Team"? The HD7950 is the first ATI board I ever owned, and frankly I've never been happier with my purchase.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.