What is everybody's score in 3dmark 2003:

jmecor · Aug 20, 2003

Using 3dmark 2003 3.1.4
- My system is this:

Intel Pentium 4 Processor 2.0GHz
256 mb of ddr266 ram
Nvidia geforce fx 5200 64mb ddr agp4x
Windows XP Professional

Running at 1024*768 and 32-bit color (no AA)

My score is:

1070 (pretty low isn't it?)

so can i get some scores from anyone who've used 3dmark 2003, better if the resolution is also 1024*768. :evil:

My computer is sooo fast,
It finished SETI in 10 seconds.

davepermen · Aug 20, 2003

i have about 5000 or so on a p4 2.4gig, no ht, no fsb800, and radeon9700pro, 9 months old..

quite fine i do feel..

thought, at home i have about 1000 less because of the celeron, or the motherboard.. 🙁

"take a look around" - limp bizkit

www.google.com

Caimbeul · Aug 20, 2003

Jm was that with your new card? 5200 wasnt it?

I myself recently Scored 72,663 whilst running multiple SETI sessions ;-P

Back to the real world: On build 330 I scored 1469 on the system below, aditional info = 2xSeagate Barracuda's @ 7,200rpm with hardly any room on eihter. Dual Channel mode for the PC2700 DDR. Bios setings set to agressive all round, memory running @ 5,2,2,2 (i think) The only thing Overclocked is my Ti4200 and I cant remember what i clocked it to but it wasnt that high.

Anyone know if this is any good?

Mmm Dawn AND Eve at the same time...Drroooooll
-------------------------------------------------
XP2100+, 1Gb RAM, ASUS A7N8X, PNY 64Mb Ti4200. 😎

jihiggs · Aug 20, 2003

i got 3200 i believe. that was with an xp 1700 radeon 9500pro 512 megs ram. dont know what res it was, whatever the free version defaults to.

wpdclan.com cs game server - 69.12.5.119:27015

TheMASK · Aug 20, 2003

A7V8X, 1700+ OCd to 2800+, 1*512MB DDR400 @ 190FSB, ASUS GF4 MX440 64MB 4X

3D Mark 03 score : 297

Just be ABU - Always Be Useful!

sargeduck · Aug 20, 2003

I get 2312 3d marks. This was a while ago, before cat 3.4, and the new patch for 3d mark came out to stop Nvidia from cheating.

My system:
celeron 1.1 @ 1.4ghz
512 megs of pc 133
epox 3vsa2 mb using the via apollo Pro 133T
Radeon 9600Pro
30 gig 7200 rpm WD with 2mb cache
Sound blaster Audigy

mrface · Aug 20, 2003

really iget 3460 with my 9600 pro

-=[ Addicted, Finally. ]=-

vacs · Aug 20, 2003

6343

<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1099532" target="_new">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1099532</A>

Jake75 · Aug 20, 2003

I got 750 or so with my XP1600, GeForce4Ti4200, 512PC2100...I've been told I should get at least twice as much but I'm to lazy to 'mess' around and try to localize the 'error'

And I'm only playing Medal Of Honor anyway

Youth is wasted on the young

noko · Aug 21, 2003

Default driver settings, looped 3 times, overclocked Tyan Tachyon G9700Pro, default 3dMark2003 settings:

<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1149175" target="_new">6149</A>

jmecor · Aug 21, 2003

did someone here get more than 4ofps in that nature test?


My computer is sooo fast,
It finished SETI in 10 seconds.

noko · Aug 21, 2003

37.6fps, not 4ofps, oh well. Should be able too if I overclock the core to 425mhz. Hmmm, maybe I will try tonite

.

phsstpok · Aug 21, 2003

1344 - Tbred @2.1 Ghz, Epox 8KTA3PRO (KT133A), 384 MB SDRAM @150 Mhz, Radeon 8500OEM 300/325

56K, slow and steady does not win the race on internet!

phsstpok · Aug 21, 2003

D*mn, I've got to get a 9600Pro!

2312 is a nice score for a Socket370 Celeron system w/ SDRAM!

What score do you get for 3DMark2001?

56K, slow and steady does not win the race on internet!

Spitfire_x86 · Aug 21, 2003

My score is 814.

System specs:

Duron 1 GHz @ 1.15 GHz (230 MHz FSB)
ABIT NF7 v2.0
128 MB PC1840 DDR RAM 2.0-2-2-5
Gigabyte Radeon 9000 (64 MB, non-Pro)

I'm using only 128 MB RAM, otherwise I would get ~1000

----------------
<A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A>

<A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A>

jmecor · Aug 21, 2003

i know i can get over 1400 if i disable some of my programs running in the background while benchmarking.


My computer is sooo fast,
It finished SETI in 10 seconds.

Willamette_sucks · Aug 21, 2003

Highest score evar was about 6650. (3.4s, closed all unneccessary apps, same specs as below)

With the 3.6s and build 330 I routinely get ~6600. I don't think I get over 40fps av. in the Nature test, I'll check when I get home. I think its like 36.

A7n8x rev. 2, 2700+ @ 12x200, 2x256mb xms3500 sync w/fsb at 5-2-2-2, all aggressive settings, 128mb 9800 Pro at 460/380.
Fastwrites + sideband addressing ON (you losers), shadowing options ON! (losers).

"Mice eat cheese." - Modest Mouse

"Every Day is the Right Day." -Pink FloydEdited by Willamette_Sucks on 08/21/03 12:29 PM.

sargeduck · Aug 21, 2003

For 3d Mark 2001 I get 7137.
Not too bad I suppose considering my system. The 9600 Pro was a nice little jump from my old video card, a geforce 4 mx 440 :redface:

phsstpok · Aug 21, 2003

Now I really do want a 9600 PRO (or 9500 PRO).

I'm getting 9130 in 3DMark2001. You get 7130. However, I only get 1344 in 3DMark2003 while you get 2312.

Now since you have a Celeron @1.4 and I have a Tbred @2.1 it looks to me that I could get big gains upgrading my 8500 to a 9600Pro. We both have SDRAM platforms so I think my Tbred @2.1 should yield even higher performance when using equal video cards. I hope it should, anyway.

56K, slow and steady does not win the race on internet!

Mask · Aug 21, 2003

i got about 5000 3dmark03
barton 3000+ (litle oc) , ati 9500np(cat 3.4)and 776mb ddr333

speeduk · Aug 21, 2003

5000 on a 9500np ???? Hmmm faster than my 9700pro at stock speeds on my 2436mhz barton @ 203mhz fsb :/ Oh wait im using omega drivers, that took about 200 marks off my score from cat 3.4's but still thats a good score!

<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6884109" target="_new"> MY RIG </A>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1150155" target="_new"> 3D-03 </A>
 120% overclocker (cheapskate)

sargeduck · Aug 22, 2003

Yes, you really should get a 9600Pro (or 9500Pro)

. I imagine you would see some pretty nice improvements with your setup. I know I did when I upgraded from my geforce 4 mx 440 card. Man, that card sucked. I know my processor is bottlenecking my graphics card, but I needed something better than my mx 440.

lhgpoobaa · Aug 22, 2003

Bah. Who cares about 3dSchlongStroke? Go play some game!

My Car comes with Hyper Threading enabled:
1970 General Motors Holden HT Kingswood Wagon

Regards,
Mr no integrity coward.

marneus · Aug 22, 2003

4200-odd with Xp2000 & R9700pro...

Trust me I know what I'm doing... ooops, grab the cat...

GeneticWeapon · Aug 22, 2003

<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=932041" target="_new">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=932041</A>

I help because you suck.
Play Raven Shield

What is everybody's score in 3dmark 2003:

Distinguished

Distinguished

Distinguished

Splendid

Distinguished

Distinguished

Champion

Distinguished

Distinguished

Distinguished

Distinguished

Distinguished

Splendid

Splendid

Splendid

Distinguished

Distinguished

Distinguished

Splendid

Distinguished

Distinguished

Distinguished

Illustrious

Distinguished

Splendid

Share this page