What's the use of "n" and "nn" in dungeons...

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.warcraft (More info?)

On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 02:11:13 -0700, Brian wrote:

> I'm sorry, but I can't accept "I won't post the details" as anything other
> than bullshit rumor-mongering.

Then try it in the game and be creative. If you expect me to post exploits
here, then sorry, that's not going to happen. It is meaningless to me
whether you personally think I am "bullshit rumour-mongering", and you
don't have to believe me. When/if Blizzard fixes this, I'll post the
details, not before.

M.
--
ClamWin, an open source antivirus software for Windows:
http://www.clamwin.com/

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.warcraft (More info?)

On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 10:42:36 +0100, "??? Abo ???"
<nospam@myaddress.thanks> wrote:

>Daniel Bleisteiner wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:23:09 +0200, <maxnews01@web.de> wrote:
>>> u post n for need and g for "greed" i think...
>>> u post it, cause if all dont need (so "g") all roll... if u just pass
>>> roll (and all do) the first looter gets it...
>>
>> So the only use is to roll for it if nobody really needs it. If one
>> needs it he/she could simply roll for it... there is no need to say
>> "n". And what the hell is wrong if the looter gets it if nobody else
>> wants it? I still don't see any use for that chatting so far. I'd
>> really prefer to simply roll or pass.
>
>Becuase if everyone says 'g' then everyone rolls. What if everyone passes?

If everyone says 'g' everyone rolls.

If everyone says 'n' everyone rolls.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.warcraft (More info?)

On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 05:01:34 +0200, Michael Vondung <mvondung@gmail.com>
scribed into the ether:

>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 02:11:13 -0700, Brian wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry, but I can't accept "I won't post the details" as anything other
>> than bullshit rumor-mongering.
>
>Then try it in the game and be creative. If you expect me to post exploits
>here, then sorry, that's not going to happen. It is meaningless to me
>whether you personally think I am "bullshit rumour-mongering", and you
>don't have to believe me. When/if Blizzard fixes this, I'll post the
>details, not before.

Without the "bug" being known, it WON'T GET FIXED, thus allowing those
folks who know about it to abuse it for a lengthy period of time.

I'm guessing this is your first MMOG. Always in the past, rapid and
widespread publication of an abuse has lead to that abuse being almost
immediately fixed. Plus, it allows for potential victims of the abuse to be
aware of it beforehand, making it more difficult to pull off, not less.