So nvidia is king right now, eh?
Yes, image quality, heat/power consumption and most importantly
performance.
Is the ati r600 comparable at all right now to the nvidia 8800?
Performance wise it is to the 8800GTS but it uses more power, is hotter, cost more and typically gets beaten by the GTS when AA and AF are enabled.
ati have driver issues it sounds?
Yes and let it be known that ATI clowns will argue that Nvidia had driver issues at launch as well which is true but they like to grossly over exaggerate this :roll: , HOWEVER the issues that Nvidia suffered at launch were no where NEAR the level of Severity as ATI is seeing.
ATI is suffering from bad performance with AA and AF enabled and there is really no way around this, new drivers will make minimal difference because-
1) AA performance, since the AA resolve is being done on the ALU's it takes a bigger hit, this has nothing to do with bandwidth, fillrates, ROP's, there is at least a 10% overhead for this.
AF, filtering hurts the r600 because it only has 16 TMU's, it gets hits more then the g80 because the g80 has more TMU's. No way around this
2) AA bluring is due to the CFAA modes, don't like them? Don't use em. X8 MSAA is the highest you can go against the competition. The g80 can go up to x16 CSAA and x16q
3) AA performance at x8 AA will be lower for the r600 look at point 1.
Nvidia launch drivers mainly suffered buggy issues with certain games, Performance however was awesome and off the charts unlike ATI's new card.