I had two power supplies fail (Antec and Corsair) that were approx. 5 years old, within a few weeks of each other, and the Antec PSU fried the motherboard. Now I'm building a new system and I am wary of having another PSU failure in the future.
I happen to have two brand new PSUs but I will choose one of them for my main system. My new system will draw only around 300W idle and maybe 400W when loaded, but I'd like to future proof somewhat, for increasingly power hungry video cards.
I have a brand new Cooler Master 850 and a Seasonic 560W.
The Cooler Master 850 gets around 85% efficiency in real world testing, while the Seasonic gets close to 90% efficiency.
The Cooler Master 850 is rated higher, but the Seasonic tends to under-report their capability and tests show that it continues to perform with high efficiency at more than 700W when it finally shuts itself down in the mid 700s.
Which one is less likely to blow up on me 5 years from now? The Seasonic because it has higher quality parts and more efficient design, or the Cooler Master because it is rated for higher wattage and it would be under a lower % load all the time?
I happen to have two brand new PSUs but I will choose one of them for my main system. My new system will draw only around 300W idle and maybe 400W when loaded, but I'd like to future proof somewhat, for increasingly power hungry video cards.
I have a brand new Cooler Master 850 and a Seasonic 560W.
The Cooler Master 850 gets around 85% efficiency in real world testing, while the Seasonic gets close to 90% efficiency.
The Cooler Master 850 is rated higher, but the Seasonic tends to under-report their capability and tests show that it continues to perform with high efficiency at more than 700W when it finally shuts itself down in the mid 700s.
Which one is less likely to blow up on me 5 years from now? The Seasonic because it has higher quality parts and more efficient design, or the Cooler Master because it is rated for higher wattage and it would be under a lower % load all the time?