Now this is particularly controversial and there may appear a multitude of differing and intriguing perceptions and points of view.
Sure, on my current machine, the Core i7-12700H does not appear to bear more than 2-4% usage under lighter circumstances of usage, yet there exists the question of what would happen if you do not use your computer only lightly. For example, writing programs in Studio 2022 and having Terabytes of software installed and set up and a lot of software running continually while on the machine there's currently physically performed nothing.
Then, even a 4 core / 8 thread CPU would not mandatorily get the work done well (or at least as fast as one'd prefer). And you would see results on the Task Manager and spikes of percentage which would not look so pretty even while doing nothing (but still having a lot of software in the background).
Even a Pentium 4 ran well on Windows 7. Now, if you somehow manage to install a version of Windows 11 on one of the last Pentium 4s, you'd hardly see anything lower than 80-100% on the Task Manager at all.
It is a compilation of big and badly written software which requires a lot faster machines than those of the past for synonymous things.
Tell me your experiences with heavy usage on Windows 11 and what you think. Perhaps you'd be able to compare the activities you'd performed to synonymous ones on Windows XP, Vista or 7.
Thank you!
PS. I am referring to machines with lesser cores than the i7-12700H. The major question is 'Why should we need to go that high up to be able to get more complex work done?'
Sure, on my current machine, the Core i7-12700H does not appear to bear more than 2-4% usage under lighter circumstances of usage, yet there exists the question of what would happen if you do not use your computer only lightly. For example, writing programs in Studio 2022 and having Terabytes of software installed and set up and a lot of software running continually while on the machine there's currently physically performed nothing.
Then, even a 4 core / 8 thread CPU would not mandatorily get the work done well (or at least as fast as one'd prefer). And you would see results on the Task Manager and spikes of percentage which would not look so pretty even while doing nothing (but still having a lot of software in the background).
Even a Pentium 4 ran well on Windows 7. Now, if you somehow manage to install a version of Windows 11 on one of the last Pentium 4s, you'd hardly see anything lower than 80-100% on the Task Manager at all.
It is a compilation of big and badly written software which requires a lot faster machines than those of the past for synonymous things.
Tell me your experiences with heavy usage on Windows 11 and what you think. Perhaps you'd be able to compare the activities you'd performed to synonymous ones on Windows XP, Vista or 7.
Thank you!
PS. I am referring to machines with lesser cores than the i7-12700H. The major question is 'Why should we need to go that high up to be able to get more complex work done?'