Chaps,
I'm upgrading my MB/CPU again. I had it all chosen, MSI K7N2 delta-L and the 333mhz version of the 2600XP.
But I've recently been tempted by the 2500XP with the new Barton core.
They both cost around the same, but I'm blowed if I can find a review of the 2500 or a comparison.
I know the Barton is 1800, and the T'bred is about 200mhz more, and I'm also awae of the difference in cache sizes, but I can't work out what balances out better.
I've read your various comments, and it all seems subjective, dependant on whether you plan overclocking or not.
So here's my question. I do not overclock, I mainly play games/edit photo's, so in your opinion (which I tend to trust)which is better for me - 2500 barton or 2600 T'bred.
I plan buying this week so...
It's a learning curve dontchaknow....
AMD 1800XP
1024mb Crucial PC2700 RAM
MSI KT3 MB
128mb RADEON 9700 Pro
I'm upgrading my MB/CPU again. I had it all chosen, MSI K7N2 delta-L and the 333mhz version of the 2600XP.
But I've recently been tempted by the 2500XP with the new Barton core.
They both cost around the same, but I'm blowed if I can find a review of the 2500 or a comparison.
I know the Barton is 1800, and the T'bred is about 200mhz more, and I'm also awae of the difference in cache sizes, but I can't work out what balances out better.
I've read your various comments, and it all seems subjective, dependant on whether you plan overclocking or not.
So here's my question. I do not overclock, I mainly play games/edit photo's, so in your opinion (which I tend to trust)which is better for me - 2500 barton or 2600 T'bred.
I plan buying this week so...
It's a learning curve dontchaknow....
AMD 1800XP
1024mb Crucial PC2700 RAM
MSI KT3 MB
128mb RADEON 9700 Pro