If you want an intel series 10 CPU, you should definitely get a sufficient after-market cooler. RAM speed doesn't matter a great deal beyond 3600MHz, because most applications won't even need that much RAM speed, especially games. I do believe the 10400f has marginal performance improvements over the 3600 (meaning it has only a little bit better gaming performance), but the 3600 will probably perform better in multi-core applications like any adobe product or blender. Intel usually takes more money (expensive mobo and cooler) and has a more expensive upgrade path. AMD doesn't, it is much more budget-friendly because it is less expensive (cheaper than intel when buying a proficient mobo, comes with a good cooler if not overclocking) and has a cheaper upgrade path. I would recommend the 3600. I hope this helps.btw is really neccesary buy a better cooler if i will never overclock them?
and what ram speed is better for each one?
sorry my english
In the case of locked Intel CPUs on non-overclocking motherboards, super-fast RAM is pointless since memory support is limited to 2666MT/s. At most, get the fastest memory that has no meaningful price premium over 2666MT/s (3200MT/s often costs within $2 for 16GB) and then manually tighten timings to something likely much better than generic 2666MT/s RAM is typically capable of.RAM speed doesn't matter a great deal beyond 3600MHz, because most applications won't even need that much RAM speed
I totally agree!Unless u get a real good deal on i5 10400f for me r5 3600 is the better cpu price wise always.
Practically nothing comes with "the best" cooler, only with one that should be good enough for typical use at stock settings. Including "the best" would add too much cost for something most people won't need and may not fit the intended application.Yes but r5 3600 might need extra cooler cause the stock one isnt the best.
Yes but r5 3600 might need extra cooler cause the stock one isnt the best.
If you want an intel series 10 CPU, you should definitely get a sufficient after-market cooler. RAM speed doesn't matter a great deal beyond 3600MHz, because most applications won't even need that much RAM speed, especially games. I do believe the 10400f has marginal performance improvements over the 3600 (meaning it has only a little bit better gaming performance), but the 3600 will probably perform better in multi-core applications like any adobe product or blender. Intel usually takes more money (expensive mobo and cooler) and has a more expensive upgrade path. AMD doesn't, it is much more budget-friendly because it is less expensive (cheaper than intel when buying a proficient mobo, comes with a good cooler if not overclocking) and has a cheaper upgrade path. I would recommend the 3600. I hope this helps.
Wow, that's a very bare motherboard. It should be fine in such a combo, but forget about an upgrade path with that until the next generational socket change from Intel.look a this intel mobo, its at 100usd in my country, you think is worth or is a very low range mobo to pair with a i5 10400f and rx 580?
https://www.msi.com/Motherboard/B460M-PRO/Specification
Since u build a gaming pc u will always try to change something to get more fps so an aftermarket cooler should always consider a buy in my opinion. I like my pc run cool but that is my taste i dont want over 60 on games ( i5 8600k noctua dh-15 cromax black 2 140 infront intake 1 140 exhaust rear and 2 top exhaust case is coolermaster h500p mesh white) and ryzen can go real hot. Dont forget summer is coming. I agree that all stock coolers depending what u are doing can be good or mediocre.The stock cooler is fine...people run into problems with poorly ventilated cases and running PBO which is basically worthless on the 3600.