You'd think a company like Intel with all it's infinite wisdom and R&D budget could come up with something better than the Pentium 4. At first, I was willing to keep my mouth shut on the crappy performance the P4 delivered and let Intel <try> and fix it. But no.... months later we are still stuck with the lame performance overpriced P4. I've read benchmarks from 3 different websites comparing the P4 and Athlon 1.333- the only two frigin benchmarks the P4 can beat are the "WebContent" and "Memory Bandwidth". Wow. I'm impressed. How long has the Athlon had the same core? Quite a long time and it STILL beats out a P4. That's sad.
Now, let's all laugh at the crappy performance the Itanium will put out when it's released.
I live 1 mile from an Intel R&D plant in DuPont, WA. I see those dudes spend more time in starbucks then in their offices. I actually had the balls to walk up to a group of developers (in starbucks) and ask them "Why does the P4 suck so bad?" None of them could give me a straight answer. I then realized they were all wearing lame t-shirts with "Pentium 4" and "Itanium" logo's all over them. It then dawned on me that Intel cares more about marketing than performance.
-MP Jesse
"Signatures Suck"<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by mpjesse on 03/24/01 04:49 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
Now, let's all laugh at the crappy performance the Itanium will put out when it's released.
I live 1 mile from an Intel R&D plant in DuPont, WA. I see those dudes spend more time in starbucks then in their offices. I actually had the balls to walk up to a group of developers (in starbucks) and ask them "Why does the P4 suck so bad?" None of them could give me a straight answer. I then realized they were all wearing lame t-shirts with "Pentium 4" and "Itanium" logo's all over them. It then dawned on me that Intel cares more about marketing than performance.
-MP Jesse
"Signatures Suck"<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by mpjesse on 03/24/01 04:49 AM.</EM></FONT></P>