8350rocks :
juanrga :
2) Charlie speculated about the XboxOne being clocked at ~1.9GHz. I also read rumours that the PS4 could be finally clocked at 2.0GHz. That are all rumours. I solicited you a proof and you are giving me none. Moreover, those 1.9--2.0Ghz are very far from your claim that the PS4 is clocked at 2.75Ghz. The 2.75GHz listed in the FCC file was the GDDR5 memory clock.
It was not speculation, based on the hardware specs, you can reconcile the clockspeed of the CPU.
3) I have more than one source. Read my reply to noob2222. If you have one source that says that Kaveri is being manufactured on SOI process, please share it with us.
http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/showthread.php?t=170062
You can't follow the link to the SOI conference anymore, however, shortly after AMD announced going bulk over a year ago, they then fired a bunch of people (those that spoke of bulk included) and then they were talking to GF a month later about FD-SOI @ 28nm at the global SOI conference...you do the math.
4) Four weeks ago Intel said:
14 nanometer on-track to enter production by the end of the year
We are on track to start production on our 14 nanometer process technology in the back half of this year
In any case, I hope that different foundries will catch Intel around the 14nm and Intel will lose the advantage.
LOL...if you believe anything out of Intel these days you're crazy. If 14nm will be on time, why the hasfail refresh and delay of everything @ 14nm node? Because they want to make less money? This
is the evil empire we're talking about...decisions to make less money don't happen...even if it means cheating/lying/skewing numbers to make more money.
Before I forget this: your claim that XboxOne has not PhysX support is also incorrect
http://nvidianews.nvidia.com/Releases/NVIDIA-Announces-PhysX-Support-for-Microsoft-Xbox-One-Game-Console-997.aspx
Charlie's claim is his speculation, that is why he writes "
if", before obtaining the 1.88GHz. The speculation must be very solid, but continues not being an official confirmation. Can we differentiate between speculation and official claims?
I believe that my speculation about Kaveri clocks and GFLOPS is solid, but it is my speculation and that is why I never said that it is an official claim by AMD. Do you understand the difference?
After saying you that speculations in forums by anonymous posters don't count as source, you gave me one of those!!!! And I am warned that I "can't follow the link to the SOI conference anymore". LOL And add to that I know to the poster and his record of posting nonsense/BS about Kaveri/Steamroller...
With that defensive attitude you couldn't believe anything said by Intel/AMD/Nvidia those days. Or do you believe Nvidia 'explanations' about Tegra sales? Or do you believe AMD 'explanations' about Kaveri's non-delayed delay? Or do you believe AMD saying one day that PS4 has hUMA and negating it the next day? LOL
So far as I know 14nm is on track and scheduled 14nm products are coming next year. I have given you above two confirmation made by Intel employees in a recent meeting. Maybe Broadwell delay has other causes
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20130829163840_Intel_Changes_Plans_Core_i_Broadwell_Processors_Will_Be_Available_in_LGA_Packaging_But_There_Is_a_Catch.html