While I object to this term fanboy with its negative connotations, I have been a fan of AMD since my first PC CPU, an AMD K6-2 300, which gave me a whopping 300mhz over my Amiga which was running at 40mhz. The price was right and while I knew there was faster stuff out there, I liked the combination of a great price and a decent speed. I've bought AMD since then as year on they've come up with a good price/performance balance that's either meant I could keep the same motherboard or buy into a lower end CPU that's still faster than my last CPU. Now having said all that and shown I'm no Intel follower, this whole thread of compilers not being optimised for AMD just sounds like desperate noise to cover up what has been an absolutely sham of a processor launch for AMD. Lets not forget that this new Bulldozer FX-8150, running on a top of the range motherboard hasn't even been able to beat an old 1100T, not even while overclocked, something Bulldozer was supposed to be amazing at, and by beaten, I mean something significant, not just a few per cent faster. So lets not get tied up name calling or blaming anyone but AMD. The architecture is a failure, just look at the awful cherry picked benchmarks showing Bulldozer going up against Intels best in gaming benchmarks where the CPU isn't even a big issue. It all smacks of desperate measures to cover up what is right now, a big flop of a CPU. I still rate the six core AMD chips, the 1090T and 1100T. Great processors at a great price that run on cheap motherboards. It's hard not to love them even though Intel has so much better for a good chunk more in money. The 1100T is actually good enough for me and Intel has nothing for that price that gives me such a great Cinebench score, which is really all I care about as that's my main use for my PC. So Bulldozer is a flop, its projected growth of 10-15% clock speed per year is enough to inform me that Intel will be my next processor after the 1100T. As to what others choose, well that's up to them but there isn't a single use case scenario where I'd recommend any Bulldozer CPU right now, knowing you need a top of the range 990FX AM3+ motherboard when you can just drop in a 1100T that's so much cheaper on a much cheaper motherboard and get almost, within a few percent, the same performance. As that's now a dead end chipset, it's even harder to recommend now. I think overall whether its gaming, general use, heavily multi threaded or a combination of all those that you need, Intel has the best answer for you right now on price / performance / upgrade path. And I can't tell you how much that bothers me to say that after being so happy with AMD stuff for all these years.