RichPLS
Champion
What I am seeing with AMD and with their marketing claims of scared to release specifics clock and performance tests because Intel is liable to glean technology from AMD demoing stbr product, and might quickly redesign Intel's well outlaid strategic plan and alter with AMD tech at last second, releasing a new better chip that is built of AMD observance of a demo showing?!?
WTF are they thinking we are??? That sounds like a shariwho or MMM comment more than an AMD statement...
It sure stinks of BS... and imo more likely reflects a mirror image of what AMD is doing due to Intel's release and future outlines, that internally AMD realized they had not counted on such a strong blowing and going from Intel, and Barc was intended to blow the doors off 4Ghz Hyper-threading tech, but C2D stunned them and quickly like a black project AMD is doing the risky quick redesign of their chips using concepts gleaned from Intel's successful C2D technology... maybe even they have C2D samples reverse engineering them to hopefully learn some ideas to implement and are risking it all on it working, and this takes delay and BS press statements to keep the cover on what is really going on behind closed doors...
It could be they produce a good chip, but in the rush, it may be clocked stock at within 5 or 10% of max overclock, which could mean it may perform close to intel, but if overclocked falls way short again...
Regardless how you see it, it is hard to see any positive aspects from the way AMD is conducting themselves.
WTF are they thinking we are??? That sounds like a shariwho or MMM comment more than an AMD statement...
It sure stinks of BS... and imo more likely reflects a mirror image of what AMD is doing due to Intel's release and future outlines, that internally AMD realized they had not counted on such a strong blowing and going from Intel, and Barc was intended to blow the doors off 4Ghz Hyper-threading tech, but C2D stunned them and quickly like a black project AMD is doing the risky quick redesign of their chips using concepts gleaned from Intel's successful C2D technology... maybe even they have C2D samples reverse engineering them to hopefully learn some ideas to implement and are risking it all on it working, and this takes delay and BS press statements to keep the cover on what is really going on behind closed doors...
It could be they produce a good chip, but in the rush, it may be clocked stock at within 5 or 10% of max overclock, which could mean it may perform close to intel, but if overclocked falls way short again...
Regardless how you see it, it is hard to see any positive aspects from the way AMD is conducting themselves.