I just got through reading the THGC CPU Buyers' Guide. Boy was that a heck of a read. Many thanks for putting that together, Spitfire.
It was very enlightening. The only problem now is that is a bit outdated and prices have shifted since it was written. I'm looking to put together a PC that will have the following roles in order of importance:
1 - 3D rendering
2 - video capture / conversion (like from video tape to DVDs)
3 - games
4 - Multitrack recording
5 - regular boring word processing and spreadsheets
I do multitrack recording and some older games on my PIII now, so those I'm not worried about too much. It's the first 2 items that I think I really need to focus on. In the THGC CPU Buyers' Guide I saw that the P4 line was tops for 3D rendering, but some of the AMD processors seemed to come in a pretty close second. So, my question is, now that prices have dropped, would I get better overall performance for the above tasks by spending $200 on an AMD or an Intel processor?
Thanks for any insights anyone may have.
Max.
It was very enlightening. The only problem now is that is a bit outdated and prices have shifted since it was written. I'm looking to put together a PC that will have the following roles in order of importance:
1 - 3D rendering
2 - video capture / conversion (like from video tape to DVDs)
3 - games
4 - Multitrack recording
5 - regular boring word processing and spreadsheets
I do multitrack recording and some older games on my PIII now, so those I'm not worried about too much. It's the first 2 items that I think I really need to focus on. In the THGC CPU Buyers' Guide I saw that the P4 line was tops for 3D rendering, but some of the AMD processors seemed to come in a pretty close second. So, my question is, now that prices have dropped, would I get better overall performance for the above tasks by spending $200 on an AMD or an Intel processor?
Thanks for any insights anyone may have.
Max.