I've got a few things to say.
AMD should abandon AM3+, I definitely agree with that. However, they still plan on focusing on servers. What they need to do is leave FM2 and APUs for budget oriented consumers, and open up the server sockets for use as enthusiast platforms.
Think about it, AMD has Asus, Gigabyte, MSI, ASRock all release server boards that can be overclocked with extra PCIe lanes, but don't support ECC and other necessary server features to prevent people from not buying real servers.
Suddenly, AMD has a very viable enthusiast platform, and it costs them nothing. Bin some chips as unlocked FX, let them work in the server socket, disable ECC, and call it a day. This means we could easily see AMD enthusiast platforms with two 16 core Piledrivers, and guess what? It isn't a special chip. It's AMD selling server chips to enthusiasts! They get to open up a new market to an existing product. Imagine the reviews of 16 core piledriver or 20 core Steamroller in multi-thread against Intel. It would win versus an Ivy Bridge E hex core and probably trade blows with an 8 core. Sell the leaky ones to enthusiasts for a reduced price compared to low wattage opterons.
It has baffled me why AMD still has AM3+. There are plenty of serious folders, renderers, transcoders, etc that would absolutely die to get a 2 CPU 16 core system that they could overclock. And you can still get 8 core Opterons which could be unlocked and sold as FX. IF you want an FX 4xx0 or hex, go to FM2.
As for the claims of third party IP, this doesn't mean they're going ARM. Resonant Clock Mesh was third party IP. At a time, ATI was third party IP. AMD could be on the prowl to snag up some third party IP from something besides ARM. I'm not ruling out the possibility, but "we're looking at third party IP" doesn't mean they're going to give up on x86 and build ARM.
As for x86 CPUs, I don't think AMD is stupid enough to say that they're going to abandon x86 performance literally days before they release an x86 performance CPU. Do you know what that would do for sales if Read pretty much said, "we're giving up on x86, here, buy our new performance x86 CPU!"
I hope we see AMD focus more on x86 server performance and more on the GPU side of things. Let the server performance trickle down to APUs. FX has never been a gaming chip and it never will be with that FPU, but the people who buy Bulldozer and all subsequent versions don't buy them to play games (if they're informed), they do it for their great Linux performance and their fantastic value for multi-threaded tasks. Even though Bulldozer wears an FX tag, it is a workstation CPU. Opterons are workstation CPUs. I thus, do not understand why AM3+ exists as a platform when Opterons are on a different platform.
AMD could save itself if it canned AM3+ and switched enthusiast desktop to server platform or created a unified socket for servers, workstations and enthusiasts. Did you guys see the XS leak with V-Ray? FX 8350 crushed Sandy Bridge with HT in V-Ray AT THE SAME CLOCKS, and it costs significantly less. Right there Autodesk and game studios would have a huge reason to go AMD CPUs for their workstations, and it's a market that AMD doesn't even have right now. Why is there not a platform for workstations where you can get one or two AMD Opterons and load it with FirePro cards?
Going FM2 for desktop enthusiasts is a bad idea. The chipset doesn't have enough PCIe lanes. They first need a new chipset. Why create a new chipset when they have a working one already? They need to re-use as much IP as possible, and putting enthusiasts on an overclockable server/workstation platform is the best way to retain the enthusiast platform while spending nearly nothing to keep it going, while still being able to increase x86 performance.