Action_Man
Splendid
Including me?
I'll address your three points since i've got some time to waste.
1) It took Intel 3 years to Meet/Beat the K8
What does that have to do with anything?
2) AMD has 2 new architectures/revisions planned for the next 12 months, K8L and K10.
Intel is incapable or doing revisions as well?
3) Not saying the benchmarks were rigged, but what happened to "we don't believe what companies say"? It seems every "neutral" person is now an Intel Troll.
Why rig them when they would be called out on it in the next few months?
Is it impossible for Intel to have an architecture designed from the ground up with their vast resources which is on a newer process not be able to beat a 3 (?) year old architecture?
I'll address your three points since i've got some time to waste.
1) It took Intel 3 years to Meet/Beat the K8
What does that have to do with anything?
2) AMD has 2 new architectures/revisions planned for the next 12 months, K8L and K10.
Intel is incapable or doing revisions as well?
3) Not saying the benchmarks were rigged, but what happened to "we don't believe what companies say"? It seems every "neutral" person is now an Intel Troll.
Why rig them when they would be called out on it in the next few months?
Is it impossible for Intel to have an architecture designed from the ground up with their vast resources which is on a newer process not be able to beat a 3 (?) year old architecture?