I moved her OS to a KT400 with a bad floppy controller I have lying around. I killed the floppy testing someone else's bad floppy drive. It also melted my powersupply's FDD connector. I should never test suspect parts in my good PC for free
🙁
I also poped in another hard drive and did an unattened install of XPSP2 & Sandra 2005.
Sandra Benchmarks were within .5% close enought that I know it was the fact that one OS was loaded with software where the other had only one program installed that made the difference.
Also the system ran Prime 95 and Sandra's burn in Wizzard for 24 hours with 0 errors and zero warnings.
Only thing broken is MS Office, Norton Ghost, and Roxio Easy CD Creator 5.
I think Roxio was broke to begin with, although with that program its hard to tell.
MS Office 2003 and Ghost 2005 both fail due to product activation issues.
Eventually I will do a clean install of XP SP2 for her, but as I am working for free I won't be doing it until I feel like it
She has friend with a MCSE cert, who don't know crap but insists that her MSCE is somehow makes her more qualified than my 4 year CIS degree (and 7 years of system building/troublshooting). She keeps getting upset because they never ask her for free help.
I keep telling me friend that an MCSE is definately much better and she obviously knows much more me as my coursework never even mentioned Microsoft and only made passing reference to the x86 architechture.
Unfortunately my friend won't believe me.
Anyway apparently there is no performace penalty moving from between KT133a, KT266a & KT400 systems.
I just upgraded from a NF2 to NF4 and my OS loaded fine, though I had problems with my Optical drives until I loaded the proper NF4 drivers.
I did a clean install anyway, but I regret not having benchmarked the system. I still have a image of the OS so I can alwasy go back and see.