nukemaster, yes i know the 5 series sucked, but that was the only one, if i remember. nvidia dudes were bad tempered and microsoft did what they do best ![Smile :) :)](/data/assets/smilies/smile.gif)
I say that in desperation to make a good impress in these benchmarks on different websites, the ati dudes, cut corners with quality they render. for some reason ati cards have a weackness at shadows and blending colors. for example, if you play a game that has a lot of grass, with many colors, the ati cards show less nuances of the same colors. same with explosions and other effects, the color pallete of ati cards seem narrower and they shouldn't do that, really.
i know that making an impression with fps on these forums and websites, will sell more cards, but affecting the quality and gaming experience ..!? for what we need a fast card, if it shows us just a part of the fun in high frames ? lets do black and white cards then, i bet those will do 500 frames in all games
.
For now, the image quality of ati cards is good enough, where nvidia is the best.
I guess that both are good and can be somewhat equal, IF ati will stop cutting quality for the sake of few FPS. Looks like nvidia is making less compromises in this matter. Ati is fast, nvidia is fast, but is fast showing some more details.. and aren't those details the reason for what we pay for a better card ?
![Smile :) :)](/data/assets/smilies/smile.gif)
I say that in desperation to make a good impress in these benchmarks on different websites, the ati dudes, cut corners with quality they render. for some reason ati cards have a weackness at shadows and blending colors. for example, if you play a game that has a lot of grass, with many colors, the ati cards show less nuances of the same colors. same with explosions and other effects, the color pallete of ati cards seem narrower and they shouldn't do that, really.
i know that making an impression with fps on these forums and websites, will sell more cards, but affecting the quality and gaming experience ..!? for what we need a fast card, if it shows us just a part of the fun in high frames ? lets do black and white cards then, i bet those will do 500 frames in all games
![Smile :) :)](/data/assets/smilies/smile.gif)
For now, the image quality of ati cards is good enough, where nvidia is the best.
I guess that both are good and can be somewhat equal, IF ati will stop cutting quality for the sake of few FPS. Looks like nvidia is making less compromises in this matter. Ati is fast, nvidia is fast, but is fast showing some more details.. and aren't those details the reason for what we pay for a better card ?