Somehow, I suspect if I posted a processor comparison with overclocked A64 chips compared to regularly clocked dothans(or any other chip) and used that to declare A64 beats all else, I'd get flamed something fierce and called an AMD fanboy.The fact that the dothan is overclocked doesn't really matter though does it??
Which Dothan clocks at 2.8?Considering the dothan clocks at 2.8 on air and my 3500+ for instance gets to 2.6 (barely) (or the fx 55 in the tests) we see another picture.
Absolutely. But so far, I've only heard of taking the 2ghz dothan to 2.8, that chip ain't cheap at all from the prices I'm seeing.isn't one of the points of overclocking (apart from being fun to mess around with you hardware) to get the most performance for the least amount of money.
That depends. Which Dothan exactly gets to 2.8 on air? From what I can tell, that requires a 2 ghz Dothan. Someone correct if I'm wrong, but if I'm right, that chip is not cheap. You would have been better off getting your hands on a 3500 90nm, IMO. If you're looking for best bang for the buck.I don't know prices exactly but I'm sure that 4000+ is pretty expensive. And even if they were on par clock for clock 1:1 perfectly, wouldn't I have been better off with 2.8ghz in stead of 2.5-2.6.
<i>Nemo me impune lacesset</i>