[citation][nom]rantoc[/nom]And why do you think the 1% want the unions gone that are representing the 99%? Just shocking to see how many of the 99% think the 1% is right... at least to the day their chained in iron and put in a mine![/citation]
Why would anybody want the unions gone? Let me try to answer that.
First of all, let's not exaggerate here. The unions do not represent the 99%. For example they tend to support Democrats in elections, which doesn't help the 50% or so of American voters who normally vote Republican.
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.nr0.htm
In 2011, 7.6 million employees in the public sector belonged to a union, compared with 7.2 million union workers in the private sector.
That's 14.8 million union members, out of a USA population of 311.5 million. Counting the families of these union members too, even family members who have non-union jobs, you'll probably end up under 20% of the population.
For the other 80%, unions are mostly a negative factor. If you've got a non-union job, or no job, unions mean this for you:
- higher taxes, because people paid out of your taxes get raises (even in years when you don't)
- higher prices, because all those raises for other people produce inflation
- worse service, because people providing it can't be fired if they are rude or incompetent, get raises even if they are rude and incompetent and know it, get promoted by seniority and not by merit
- occasional interruptions of service, e.g. public transit strikes
- bad investment performance in your retirement account (stocks and mutual funds are hurt by strikes and by union demands that reduce profits). This means you have to work until you're 75 or 85, instead of, say, 65.
- fewer jobs (bad investment performance means investors will send their money to create jobs elsewhere)
- higher interest rates (because government debt keeps getting higher)
Here's an example of unions at work: the education system these days can't even make people spell "to the day they're chained in iron" properly.