Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (
More info?)
"pr" <nope@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:1gbom1tg8l1l8.dlg@ID-259643.user.individual.net...
> Quilljar <wykehill-flightsim@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > I would look at the current real weather idea, and have the scenery
> > within say, a hundred square miles around your aircraft ,downloaded from
> > satellite pictures streamed as you fly.
>
> That would be an excellent start. But unfortunately satellite imagery
> doesn't tell the whole picture.
>
> TO add to this, I would like to see the sim weather engine be able to
> download satellite imagery, the current surface analysis chart (the chart
> with the Ls and Hs and isometric lines on it), radar imagery, the aviation
> area forecast (which gives an idea of the cloud bases, layers, and tops)
> and of course, METARs for all weather reporting stations.
>
> With all of this data, the sim weather engine would then be able to
> construct a more realistic weather scenario from the ground to the flight
> levels.
>
> --
> Peter
Good progress. In addition to weather we need better traffic. Realtime
traffic data. You could also hear actual ATC, or if not, simulated based on
all aircraft positions. Also you need to be able to talk to voice
recognition AI ATC. (I actually thought FS2004 had something like that when
I read about it having "interactive ATC" or whatever).
Furthermore, RL ATC will know about simulated traffic. So we might have a
real flight being put into extended hold because of excessive simulated
traffic in the area.
Wait I think I have it. The simulator just controls an actual aircraft
that's equipped with extensive cameras! You could not get more real than
this, and it also saves the airlines on pilot expenses. We need a very
reliable Windows version however, since a PC crash also involves another
type of crash. And so just who would board such an aircraft is another
story...