An edit would have been fine, but I think your moving in the wrong direction...
Fixes to this is in order.
DX10 is locked with Vista. Windows XP, as of now, will not run DX10. However, DirectX 9 Video Cards will render DirectX 10, just not as well as a DirectX 10 card
(everything else in that paragraph is ok.)
I wonder how you think DX9 will handle the geometery shader found in DX10? I can't think of a nice way to say this, so I'll have to just be blunt. From your first post to this "fix", you seem to not understand the move to DX10. Maybe you do but can't seem to find a way to put it into words, maybe you flat out don't know. I'm asking you to fix it so people don't come along later and read INCORRECT info, and believe it to be true. People search forums like this for answers, think about what your posting first. (and if you flat out don't know, don't post.)
Lastly, PSU, 600 WATT is sufficient enough, efficiency is something different for all you people out there that pay attention to grammar and everything.
Considering the amount of money that the 600W PSU might be powering, the difference between sufficient and efficient is important. While this isn't rocket science, if you want a good computing experience, you need to pay attention to what you pick and why.
To the guy who PM me, sorry oh great one for not being clear and perfect, I didn't realize you were Jesus.
I give you a 6 for originality, but a 3 for the insult. Go to name calling if you need to, I'd fire back with facts.
Like I said in the PM, if you're here to correct people in forums, you got a huge load of work buddy! I just pulled that from other threads! People say that DX9 cards will render DX10, but will not be able to handle all of DirectX10's capabilities. Is that better wording for you Professor English?
sheesh!
But hey, the way I look at it, if you go and fix everyone's post, you should catch up to wusy's post count in no time!