sepheronx
Distinguished
here ill help you people since a lot of you guys are too biased towards either side
Want an intel to play your video games on high quality? go ahead
want to buy an AMD to play your video games on high quality? go ahead
Neither doesnt matter, my friend owns a 2.66ghz Intel p4 presscot, and he has a sweet 6800gs video card, and guess what, it runs better then my AMD 64 3000+ with a 6600gt. He has better frames then I do, and he has better quality setting. And his lowest frames are around the same as mine. My processor scored more in Aquamark 03, but that means nothing to me when im doing real world apps like pure gaming and applications. Im kicking myself for getting single core AMD of Single core Intel. The intel one multitasks A LOT better pluse it plays games just like mine just as well, for a fact that i have an intel p4 3.0ghz in the basement (parents computer) and its frames are around the same as mine and never lags once, with the same setup. So I want you MadModMike and others like you to take your biased bull crap and shove it. If someone wants either, allow them to get it, dont tell them "Oh amd is WAY BETTER" wich is not, what the AMD counterpart of the intel one is like 5-10 frames better? yeah big deal since games drop in incraments larger then 15FPS. If youre games requirements are below the minimum, then you must worry, but ive seen processors below recommended (Fear on a 2.4 ghz intel) run as smooth as butter with a 6800nu.
I feel like im the only one on here that has any knowlege at all. FOR GOD SAKES!! IF THE GAME RUNS PERFECT THEN THATS FINE!!! you dont need benchmarks to prove anything. Hell here i go, i score like sh!t in 3dmark06 and guess what, im able to play fear on almost max setting with a stable 40fps and runs smooth as silk and its beautiful, my friend scores less then me in 3dmark03 due to his processor (2.6ghz intel) and his games run just as smooth as mine, somtimes better due to my hard drive problem im having right now (ordering a new motherboard to support my Western Digital 250gb Sata2 hard drive.
Want an intel to play your video games on high quality? go ahead
want to buy an AMD to play your video games on high quality? go ahead
Neither doesnt matter, my friend owns a 2.66ghz Intel p4 presscot, and he has a sweet 6800gs video card, and guess what, it runs better then my AMD 64 3000+ with a 6600gt. He has better frames then I do, and he has better quality setting. And his lowest frames are around the same as mine. My processor scored more in Aquamark 03, but that means nothing to me when im doing real world apps like pure gaming and applications. Im kicking myself for getting single core AMD of Single core Intel. The intel one multitasks A LOT better pluse it plays games just like mine just as well, for a fact that i have an intel p4 3.0ghz in the basement (parents computer) and its frames are around the same as mine and never lags once, with the same setup. So I want you MadModMike and others like you to take your biased bull crap and shove it. If someone wants either, allow them to get it, dont tell them "Oh amd is WAY BETTER" wich is not, what the AMD counterpart of the intel one is like 5-10 frames better? yeah big deal since games drop in incraments larger then 15FPS. If youre games requirements are below the minimum, then you must worry, but ive seen processors below recommended (Fear on a 2.4 ghz intel) run as smooth as butter with a 6800nu.
I feel like im the only one on here that has any knowlege at all. FOR GOD SAKES!! IF THE GAME RUNS PERFECT THEN THATS FINE!!! you dont need benchmarks to prove anything. Hell here i go, i score like sh!t in 3dmark06 and guess what, im able to play fear on almost max setting with a stable 40fps and runs smooth as silk and its beautiful, my friend scores less then me in 3dmark03 due to his processor (2.6ghz intel) and his games run just as smooth as mine, somtimes better due to my hard drive problem im having right now (ordering a new motherboard to support my Western Digital 250gb Sata2 hard drive.