[citation][nom]Marco925[/nom]Wow, this guy is messed up. Racism isn't an opinion, it's a hate crime.You sir generalise people who believe in liberalism. this isn't a forum for political bashing of liberalism and conservatism.[/citation]
how many true hate crimes are there anymore...
if a white person hits a black person, hate crime...
look at the south park episode on it, because that is basically my opinion told in a funny way. no the n guy episode, the other one that was eairler.
tell me, someone makes you mad, what is the first thing that pops into your mind? is it all kindness and butterflies, or is it the most filthy racist/sexist terms you can think of?
i don't believe those two terms exist at large anymore, and are only brought up when a fight breaks out.
sorry thats a bit rantish, but i hate it when people are overly sensitive.
[citation][nom]billybobser[/nom]Weird, because it's not what i'd associate with being a troll.What the BBC have found is an internet c*nt. Like real life, there are *unts and they will do seemingly illogical things and antisocial things because they don't know better.I feel a proper internet troll is a little more elegant, and if done right, deserves respect. Going to the lower common denominator and hitting random deceased people on facebook with obviously upsetting comments isn't trolling."trolling is a art".[/citation]
i remember a few years ago i was on 4chan, and they caught wind of a rip page for 4 people who died because they drank their collective, don't want sanction again, off and rammed into a tree. most not wearing seat belts, and i think 1 lived because of one,
now 4chan, they heard of it, and saw the tree died to, so they started a page for treeloc, going to the rip page and complaining about how they killed a tree, and how treeloc had so much to live for.
now most peiople would be against trolling a rip page, in general, but there are some like the "i drank to much and drove with my drunk as hell friends into a tree" where you just cant feel bad for those involved at all...
also remember the an hero and had a bad day, another rip page
[citation][nom]ringzero[/nom]It sounds like you oppose any sort of law enforcement when any kind of crime is committed. Are you saying that the current law that require sex offenders to register on the Sex Offender list violates that sex offender's rights?[/citation]
i believe the term sex offender is to vague, it covers everything from forgetting to zip up your fly to having sex with a dead body, and you are all put under the same rules as the worst of the offenders. lets say you are like me, and the only way you are getting sex is from a hooker, and you get caught, time to register, now you cant live within 1000 feet of a child, park, or school zone, and need to inform everyone in the vicinity that you are a sex offender, not to mention that you lose you job most likely too...
what im saying is i dont like the sex offender register at all, and if there was no severe life altering consiqences, id probably have sex before i die.
[citation][nom]dragonsqrrl[/nom]Wonder how the trolls here on Tom's would react if confronted in real life... Always pictured them as a bunch of 14 yr old boys in their mothers basements, playing MW3 for 4 hrs a day, everyday. Now I know they could very well be pissed off 40 yr old douchebags.[/citation]
24 male, im a dick online at times, and act the same way in real life, if confronted in real life, it depends on what you do... if its verbal i will be sarcastic, if its physical, i will make sure you are the one on the floor, most if not all views i express online i will back up by saying the same thing in real life too.
[citation][nom]ringzero[/nom]Hey, thanks for replying. I agree that parents who track down and publicly humiliate sex offenders are inviting retribution, just like the BBC was risking a physical confrontation when talking to the troll. But they still have done nothing illegal. I've done nothing illegal if I yell obscenities at someone who cuts me off on the highway, but I have if I follow him and slash his tires.Parents who know of sex offenders have a responsibility to handle that information appropriately. Just like adults have a responsibility to not violate the many children who are around them. A list of registered sex offenders acts as both a punishment and a deterrent and I still don't see how this is "at the expense of someone else's kid."[/citation]
except when a sex offender if found, and lets say its statutory rape, where its only considered rape because the other person is under consent age.
all the register will say is they had sex with a minor...
lets say the neighborhood knows and starts harassing them.
one day an amber alert is made from around the area, and the neighborhood attempts to kill them because they believe he did it...
the above scenario isn't exactly uncommon.
[citation][nom]zolton33[/nom]Its not parents. What you are suggesting is saying "teach your kids how to balance themselves then let them go walk the ledges of a bridge they are fine" The question parents ask is there a reason i should endanger my child by letting them around a sex offender? And it is just not worth it. And how about this for a sex offender and potential ones? "Do not mess with children under the age of 18" Is that such a hard concept? If you do you will not only be looked down on but you will also be avoided like the plague. We are not talkingabout some one who stole a gallon of milk to feed a child we are talkingabout emotional and physical scars left on a child for life. So sorry if i say icould care less about their comfort level and how they feel.[/citation]
in the context of a 15 year old by getting sex with a woman, considering those "mental scars" that need to be treated could be more harmful than good. what would it do to you if you had to go to a psychologist, for having sex, and being told that you were taken advantage of and that's the only reason it happened, and being forced through that because that's what they believe happened, and only see the 15 year old by as a victim.
looks wise i peaked around 15 or so myself. and i mean to the point where my personality could be over looked by my looks.
--------------------------------------
i didnt bother reading the rest because it was almost 5 pages of sex offender stuff.
i have gone on in other topics you can look up of physical bullying aspect, but i also had the "emotional" crap to, granted i grew a thick callous there, and grew it fast, and i regard people who off themselves because of online bullying as weak individual and examples of darwins theory. anyone who went through any amount of in real life verbal/emotional abuse who sees someone off themselves because of online bullying cant help but think of how weak a person they were...
yea this post is going to very unpopular, i know that.