KoRn_quebecois

Distinguished
Dec 4, 2003
47
0
18,530
hi
I have seen that Clawhammer and Newcastle were offering the Athlon64 3200+. Which one should I choose or is it the exact samething?
thanks

Metal Music Is My Religion And I Am Not A Terrorist.
 
Clawhammer: 2.0Ghz 1mb L2 cache
Newcastle: 2.2Ghz 512k L2 cache

<A HREF="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/celebgay.html" target="_new">click here now!!</A>

<A HREF="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/epilepsyr.shtml" target="_new">DON'T CLICK HERE!!</A>
 
what is the best??
2.0Ghz 1mb L2 cache(less Ghz but more cache) or 2.2Ghz 512k L2 cache(more Ghz but less cache)


Metal Music Is My Religion And I Am Not A Terrorist.
 
That might be the only option at this point. I was going to get the "far cry game"/mobo/cpu from zipzoomfly but they only have the 512 version of 3200+ apparently.
From what I gather from asking around the higher clocked one is a bit faster stock but if you oc the higher cache is better.

It may not be an issue. Has amd stopped making the 1024 cache version?
 
I'd take the one with more cache and overclock it.

<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
 
If you're not overclocker, then higher freq's the way to go.

<A HREF="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/celebgay.html" target="_new">click here now!!</A>

<A HREF="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/epilepsyr.shtml" target="_new">DON'T CLICK HERE!!</A>
 
Take the higher clocked version

------------
<A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A>

<A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig</A> & <A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/benchmark.html" target="_new">3DMark score</A>