I really do not know anything about the predecessor to this monster of a GPU. But is this the reference design coming from nvidia and would there be any need to make non reference models of this card, or is it the end be all done and there?
I was looking at three manufacturer's consisting of Asus, Gigabyte, and Evga. I was having a look at them and considered buying a card from them based on their non reference versions , features, utilities, warranty, and designs.
Now I look at this GTX 690 and want it so badly but of course atm that is way too much for a GPU, and I can understand why they priced it as such. I really wonder what the 7990 will be like, if it can even touch this gpu i'll commend AMD/ATI. This will also be a chance for price wars to occur if you really think about it, so have no worries about the gtx 690 ladies and gents. If they decide to price this at 1000 dollars then guess what... amd will undercut them and sell the 7990 for much cheaper, and they will be forced to lower the price no question.
Let the price wars begin, along with the release of the mid ranged gtx 600's series. So from what that article says... x2 (or x3-x4) non referenced 680's in sli may be better than this card? I mean if I even looked at this card let alone got a chance to put this in my pc case, i'd want a 1200 watt PSU (and modular, 80+ gold at that).
I thought i'd ditch amd for ati... but the 680's and 690 have done it. I was never a fan boy to begin with, I like amd, it is an underdog you are supposed to like the underdog. If it was not for amd intel processors would have still been at monopoly type prices, and I do not want to ever see that again.