overclock barrier

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

Hi
My system is
Asus P4C800-E deluxe
2.8 Prescott with Intec stock H/S fan
2x228 Ocz 4000ELDC-K ram
300 watt Sparkle power supply
Asus 5700 video card
Maxtor hard drive
1 CD ROM
1 DVD
I have hit a rut in my overclocking.
I posted here before and Paul helped me with a very compressive reply.
He indicated that I should have no problem boosting the FSB to 250 or so.
I can get no higher that 230, and I am wondering if the reason for that is
my power supply is only 300 watts.
Thanks
Ken'
 
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

In article <dcCdnfStLNHoOi3fRVn-1Q@rogers.com>, "Ken'"
<xyz@Mailinator.com> wrote:

> Hi
> My system is
> Asus P4C800-E deluxe
> 2.8 Prescott with Intec stock H/S fan
> 2x228 Ocz 4000ELDC-K ram
> 300 watt Sparkle power supply
> Asus 5700 video card
> Maxtor hard drive
> 1 CD ROM
> 1 DVD
> I have hit a rut in my overclocking.
> I posted here before and Paul helped me with a very compressive reply.
> He indicated that I should have no problem boosting the FSB to 250 or so.
> I can get no higher that 230, and I am wondering if the reason for that is
> my power supply is only 300 watts.
> Thanks
> Ken'

Have you set "AGP/PCI Frequency (MHz)" [66.66/33.33] ?
That setting prevents the Northbridge from being overclocked.

RAM getting enough volts ?

You can check the power supply via the hardware monitor.
Either check the voltages in the BIOS or use Asus Probe
while booted into Windows. If your +12V is below +11.4V,
I'd be thinking about getting a better supply.

Paul
 
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

"Paul" <nospam@needed.com> wrote in message
news:nospam-1506051849010001@192.168.1.178...
> In article <dcCdnfStLNHoOi3fRVn-1Q@rogers.com>, "Ken'"
> <xyz@Mailinator.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> My system is
>> Asus P4C800-E deluxe
>> 2.8 Prescott with Intec stock H/S fan
>> 2x228 Ocz 4000ELDC-K ram
>> 300 watt Sparkle power supply
>> Asus 5700 video card
>> Maxtor hard drive
>> 1 CD ROM
>> 1 DVD
>> I have hit a rut in my overclocking.
>> I posted here before and Paul helped me with a very compressive reply.
>> He indicated that I should have no problem boosting the FSB to 250 or so.
>> I can get no higher that 230, and I am wondering if the reason for that
>> is
>> my power supply is only 300 watts.
>> Thanks
>> Ken'
>
> Have you set "AGP/PCI Frequency (MHz)" [66.66/33.33] ?
> That setting prevents the Northbridge from being overclocked.

Yes

> RAM getting enough volts ?

2.85

>
> You can check the power supply via the hardware monitor.
> Either check the voltages in the BIOS or use Asus Probe
> while booted into Windows. If your +12V is below +11.4V,
> I'd be thinking about getting a better supply.

Will check.
>
> Paul


Thanks
Ken'
 
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

In article <NNOdnSAdbrS7KC3fRVn-1w@rogers.com>, "Ken'"
<xyz@Mailinator.com> wrote:

> "Paul" <nospam@needed.com> wrote in message
> news:nospam-1506051849010001@192.168.1.178...
> > In article <dcCdnfStLNHoOi3fRVn-1Q@rogers.com>, "Ken'"
> > <xyz@Mailinator.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >> My system is
> >> Asus P4C800-E deluxe
> >> 2.8 Prescott with Intec stock H/S fan
> >> 2x228 Ocz 4000ELDC-K ram
> >> 300 watt Sparkle power supply
> >> Asus 5700 video card
> >> Maxtor hard drive
> >> 1 CD ROM
> >> 1 DVD
> >> I have hit a rut in my overclocking.
> >> I posted here before and Paul helped me with a very compressive reply.
> >> He indicated that I should have no problem boosting the FSB to 250 or so.
> >> I can get no higher that 230, and I am wondering if the reason for that
> >> is
> >> my power supply is only 300 watts.
> >> Thanks
> >> Ken'
> >
> > Have you set "AGP/PCI Frequency (MHz)" [66.66/33.33] ?
> > That setting prevents the Northbridge from being overclocked.
>
> Yes
>
> > RAM getting enough volts ?
>
> 2.85
>
> >
> > You can check the power supply via the hardware monitor.
> > Either check the voltages in the BIOS or use Asus Probe
> > while booted into Windows. If your +12V is below +11.4V,
> > I'd be thinking about getting a better supply.
>
> Will check.
> >
> > Paul
>
>
> Thanks
> Ken'

Have you verified the clocks and timings the system is
using, with a program like CPUZ ? I've had issues where
timing settings in the BIOS are not actually being used
to program the hardware. Verify your settings with CPUZ
(www.cpuid.com) and see if things are set up the way
you think they should be.

Paul
 
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

snip>
> Have you verified the clocks and timings the system is
> using, with a program like CPUZ ? I've had issues where
> timing settings in the BIOS are not actually being used
> to program the hardware. Verify your settings with CPUZ
> (www.cpuid.com) and see if things are set up the way
> you think they should be.
>
> Paul >snip


Paul
I have checked with CPU-Z and if I click on the memory tab it says the
timing are 3- 4- 4- 8. ( this is what OCZ web site say they are )
If I click on the SPD tab it says the timings are 3- 5- 5- 10.
I have conversed with a support rep from OCZ forum and he suggested that I
set the timings to 2.5-3-3-7
Now here is where I have a problem, if I change the bios to SPD disabled,
there is 5 places where I can input the timings, and I only have 4 numbers
to put in.
Which timings goes where?
The timing entries are
cas# to latency
Ras# to precharge
Ras# to cas# delay
precharge delay
burst length

I presume that the numbers are entered top to bottom that would leave burst
length. What is entered in it using the above numbers?
Thanks
Ken'
 
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

In article <HfudnUdBpLlzdC3fRVn-sA@rogers.com>, "Ken'"
<xyz@Mailinator.com> wrote:

> snip>
> > Have you verified the clocks and timings the system is
> > using, with a program like CPUZ ? I've had issues where
> > timing settings in the BIOS are not actually being used
> > to program the hardware. Verify your settings with CPUZ
> > (www.cpuid.com) and see if things are set up the way
> > you think they should be.
> >
> > Paul >snip
>
>
> Paul
> I have checked with CPU-Z and if I click on the memory tab it says the
> timing are 3- 4- 4- 8. ( this is what OCZ web site say they are )
> If I click on the SPD tab it says the timings are 3- 5- 5- 10.
> I have conversed with a support rep from OCZ forum and he suggested that I
> set the timings to 2.5-3-3-7
> Now here is where I have a problem, if I change the bios to SPD disabled,
> there is 5 places where I can input the timings, and I only have 4 numbers
> to put in.
> Which timings goes where?
> The timing entries are
> cas# to latency
> Ras# to precharge
> Ras# to cas# delay
> precharge delay
> burst length
>
> I presume that the numbers are entered top to bottom that would leave burst
> length. What is entered in it using the above numbers?
> Thanks
> Ken'

Slide 24: 2.5,3,3,7 = Tcas, Trcd, Trp, Tras
http://corsairmicro.com/corsair/products/tech/memory_basics/153707/index.html

Asus name Param Info in Micron Datasheet

DRAM Cas latency Tcas Column Address Strobe (Read) to data
DRAM Ras precharge Trp Precharge command period
DRAM Ras to Cas delay Trcd Active to Read or Write
DRAM Precharge delay Tras Active to Precharge delay

It looks like in Asus order, the middle two params get swapped.

Assuming a cache line is 64 bytes, and you are using dual channel
memory (16 bytes per transfer), the burst size should be 4.

(How I hate the timing param naming convention... I have to look it
up every time.)

Paul
 
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

"Paul" <nospam@needed.com> wrote in message
news:nospam-1606050049090001@192.168.1.178...
> In article <HfudnUdBpLlzdC3fRVn-sA@rogers.com>, "Ken'"
> <xyz@Mailinator.com> wrote:
>
>> snip>
>> > Have you verified the clocks and timings the system is
>> > using, with a program like CPUZ ? I've had issues where
>> > timing settings in the BIOS are not actually being used
>> > to program the hardware. Verify your settings with CPUZ
>> > (www.cpuid.com) and see if things are set up the way
>> > you think they should be.
>> >
>> > Paul >snip
>>
>>
>> Paul
>> I have checked with CPU-Z and if I click on the memory tab it says the
>> timing are 3- 4- 4- 8. ( this is what OCZ web site say they are )
>> If I click on the SPD tab it says the timings are 3- 5- 5- 10.
>> I have conversed with a support rep from OCZ forum and he suggested that
>> I
>> set the timings to 2.5-3-3-7
>> Now here is where I have a problem, if I change the bios to SPD disabled,
>> there is 5 places where I can input the timings, and I only have 4
>> numbers
>> to put in.
>> Which timings goes where?
>> The timing entries are
>> cas# to latency
>> Ras# to precharge
>> Ras# to cas# delay
>> precharge delay
>> burst length
>>
>> I presume that the numbers are entered top to bottom that would leave
>> burst
>> length. What is entered in it using the above numbers?
>> Thanks
>> Ken'
>
> Slide 24: 2.5,3,3,7 = Tcas, Trcd, Trp, Tras
> http://corsairmicro.com/corsair/products/tech/memory_basics/153707/index.html
>
> Asus name Param Info in Micron Datasheet
>
> DRAM Cas latency Tcas Column Address Strobe (Read) to data
> DRAM Ras precharge Trp Precharge command period
> DRAM Ras to Cas delay Trcd Active to Read or Write
> DRAM Precharge delay Tras Active to Precharge delay
>
> It looks like in Asus order, the middle two params get swapped.
>
> Assuming a cache line is 64 bytes, and you are using dual channel
> memory (16 bytes per transfer), the burst size should be 4.
>
> (How I hate the timing param naming convention... I have to look it
> up every time.)
>
> Paul



Paul
I tried timings of 2.5 -3 -3 -7 and burst rate of 4 and it didn't boot. I
had to clear the RTC and rest the bios defaults.
What went wrong?
Ken'
 
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

In article <_-2dnVGs2_mJUSzfRVn-pQ@rogers.com>, "Ken'"
<xyz@Mailinator.com> wrote:

> "Paul" <nospam@needed.com> wrote in message
> news:nospam-1606050049090001@192.168.1.178...
> > In article <HfudnUdBpLlzdC3fRVn-sA@rogers.com>, "Ken'"
> > <xyz@Mailinator.com> wrote:
> >
> >> snip>
> >> > Have you verified the clocks and timings the system is
> >> > using, with a program like CPUZ ? I've had issues where
> >> > timing settings in the BIOS are not actually being used
> >> > to program the hardware. Verify your settings with CPUZ
> >> > (www.cpuid.com) and see if things are set up the way
> >> > you think they should be.
> >> >
> >> > Paul >snip
> >>
> >>
> >> Paul
> >> I have checked with CPU-Z and if I click on the memory tab it says the
> >> timing are 3- 4- 4- 8. ( this is what OCZ web site say they are )
> >> If I click on the SPD tab it says the timings are 3- 5- 5- 10.
> >> I have conversed with a support rep from OCZ forum and he suggested that
> >> I
> >> set the timings to 2.5-3-3-7
> >> Now here is where I have a problem, if I change the bios to SPD disabled,
> >> there is 5 places where I can input the timings, and I only have 4
> >> numbers
> >> to put in.
> >> Which timings goes where?
> >> The timing entries are
> >> cas# to latency
> >> Ras# to precharge
> >> Ras# to cas# delay
> >> precharge delay
> >> burst length
> >>
> >> I presume that the numbers are entered top to bottom that would leave
> >> burst
> >> length. What is entered in it using the above numbers?
> >> Thanks
> >> Ken'
> >
> > Slide 24: 2.5,3,3,7 = Tcas, Trcd, Trp, Tras
> >
http://corsairmicro.com/corsair/products/tech/memory_basics/153707/index.html
> >
> > Asus name Param Info in Micron Datasheet
> >
> > DRAM Cas latency Tcas Column Address Strobe (Read) to data
> > DRAM Ras precharge Trp Precharge command period
> > DRAM Ras to Cas delay Trcd Active to Read or Write
> > DRAM Precharge delay Tras Active to Precharge delay
> >
> > It looks like in Asus order, the middle two params get swapped.
> >
> > Assuming a cache line is 64 bytes, and you are using dual channel
> > memory (16 bytes per transfer), the burst size should be 4.
> >
> > (How I hate the timing param naming convention... I have to look it
> > up every time.)
> >
> > Paul
>
>
>
> Paul
> I tried timings of 2.5 -3 -3 -7 and burst rate of 4 and it didn't boot. I
> had to clear the RTC and rest the bios defaults.
> What went wrong?
> Ken'

The SPD in your RAM says 3-4-4-8. Adjust the settings manually
a step at a time, until CPUZ reads 3-4-4-8. I couldn't figure
out what the hell the BIOS on my P4C800-E was doing, because
it was doing something different with each combo of settings I
tried. It could be that when you set 2.5-3-3-7, it used timings
that bore no relationship to those numbers. When a user selects
"manual", the BIOS should just use the settings it is given,
and not get clever. (Try dropping the FSB clock, so that if the
timings are way off, it will still POST. That may allow you to
investigate the relationship between BIOS setting versus what
you see in Windows. When Windows reads 3-4-4-8, then the RAM
is running at its rated timings, all the way up to the RAM's
max frequency. You will still need to keep an eye on the
timings, as you change the FSB again, because the BIOS might
be more clever than you think.)

While I haven't bothered, it is possible a BIOS upgrade will
do a better job of actually setting the BIOS according to the
info the user enters in the setup screen. Either that, or
try to figure out what kind of broken arithmetic the BIOS
is actually using.

This is one of the reasons for using CPUZ - to make sure that
the BIOS isn't doing something stupid.

There is nothing in the BIOS release history, to suggest they
ever fixed the DDR timing settings problem. I think I'm running
1014.

********************
Must use new Afudos(2.07) to flash BIOS.
Upgrade ASUSLiveupdate to v 5.22.02 or later

[ 1022 ]
Add Mobile CPU Voltage adjust Item.
Add Mobile CPU multiplier adjust Item.

[ V1021 ]
Patch for SATA HDD detection error
Patch Plextor SATA DVD detection error
Support mobile CPU adapter card CT-479.
Support new CPUs.

[ 1019 ]
Fixed boot order error when clear cmos and adjust sequence.
Add Item to control SATA delay time.

[ 1018 ]
Add CPU LockFree function.
Support new CPUs.

[ 1016 ]
Fix Prescott Locked CPU can't run to highest frequency.
Updata Intel RAID BIOS v3.54. Support new CPUs.
Fix the issue that Logitech QuickCam under Win98.

[ 1015 ]
Support new CPUs.
Fix boot devices fail to be disabled when more than one boot device
in the same group.

[ 1014 ]
(Please do not use Ezflash for updating this BIOS.)
Fix extended F8 Menu that can't show all devices,if you used more than
one removables HDD, and cdrom and BEV(Bootstrap Entry Vector) devices.
Revise extended memory size(16K--->64K).
Revise Ultra DMA Mode max limit(ultra DMA mode 6--->5).
Mute beep sound for USB device plug-in/plug-out.
Support new CPUs.
Fix the system hangs after clear CMOS.
Fix LAN function fail under WinNT4.0.

[ 1011 ]
Fix PS/2 keyboard and PS/2 mouse can't wake up the system from
Suspend-to-RAM (S3) and Hibernate(S4). Fix the system can't boot
to Windows 2000 after 3DLabs Wildcat VP760 XGA card driver
(v3.01.0181) is installed. Fix LPT port is disabled after flashing
a BIOS by EZ Flash. Fix the system hangs in POST (POST Code😀1)
after flashing a BIOS by EZ Flash if a FSB800 CPU is used.
Update Promise RAID boot ROM (1.00.0.37).
Fix the system can't boot from Intel CSA 82547EI PCI LAN card.

[ 1010 ]
Update Intel RAID boot ROM to v3.5.0.2568 to support RAID 1 mode.
Please also use the latest IAA to support this function.
********************

Paul
 
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

>snip
>> Paul
>> I tried timings of 2.5 -3 -3 -7 and burst rate of 4 and it didn't boot. I
>> had to clear the RTC and rest the bios defaults.
>> What went wrong?
>> Ken'
>
> The SPD in your RAM says 3-4-4-8. Adjust the settings manually
> a step at a time, until CPUZ reads 3-4-4-8. I couldn't figure
> out what the hell the BIOS on my P4C800-E was doing, because
> it was doing something different with each combo of settings I
> tried. It could be that when you set 2.5-3-3-7, it used timings
> that bore no relationship to those numbers. When a user selects
> "manual", the BIOS should just use the settings it is given,
> and not get clever. (Try dropping the FSB clock, so that if the
> timings are way off, it will still POST. That may allow you to
> investigate the relationship between BIOS setting versus what
> you see in Windows. When Windows reads 3-4-4-8, then the RAM
> is running at its rated timings, all the way up to the RAM's
> max frequency. You will still need to keep an eye on the
> timings, as you change the FSB again, because the BIOS might
> be more clever than you think.)
>
> While I haven't bothered, it is possible a BIOS upgrade will
> do a better job of actually setting the BIOS according to the
> info the user enters in the setup screen. Either that, or
> try to figure out what kind of broken arithmetic the BIOS
> is actually using.
>
> This is one of the reasons for using CPUZ - to make sure that
> the BIOS isn't doing something stupid.
>
> There is nothing in the BIOS release history, to suggest they
> ever fixed the DDR timing settings problem. I think I'm running
> 1014.
>
> ********************
> Must use new Afudos(2.07) to flash BIOS.
> Upgrade ASUSLiveupdate to v 5.22.02 or later
>
> [ 1022 ]
> Add Mobile CPU Voltage adjust Item.
> Add Mobile CPU multiplier adjust Item.
>
> [ V1021 ]
> Patch for SATA HDD detection error
> Patch Plextor SATA DVD detection error
> Support mobile CPU adapter card CT-479.
> Support new CPUs.
>
> [ 1019 ]
> Fixed boot order error when clear cmos and adjust sequence.
> Add Item to control SATA delay time.
>
> [ 1018 ]
> Add CPU LockFree function.
> Support new CPUs.
>
> [ 1016 ]
> Fix Prescott Locked CPU can't run to highest frequency.
> Updata Intel RAID BIOS v3.54. Support new CPUs.
> Fix the issue that Logitech QuickCam under Win98.
>
> [ 1015 ]
> Support new CPUs.
> Fix boot devices fail to be disabled when more than one boot device
> in the same group.
>
> [ 1014 ]
> (Please do not use Ezflash for updating this BIOS.)
> Fix extended F8 Menu that can't show all devices,if you used more than
> one removables HDD, and cdrom and BEV(Bootstrap Entry Vector) devices.
> Revise extended memory size(16K--->64K).
> Revise Ultra DMA Mode max limit(ultra DMA mode 6--->5).
> Mute beep sound for USB device plug-in/plug-out.
> Support new CPUs.
> Fix the system hangs after clear CMOS.
> Fix LAN function fail under WinNT4.0.
>
> [ 1011 ]
> Fix PS/2 keyboard and PS/2 mouse can't wake up the system from
> Suspend-to-RAM (S3) and Hibernate(S4). Fix the system can't boot
> to Windows 2000 after 3DLabs Wildcat VP760 XGA card driver
> (v3.01.0181) is installed. Fix LPT port is disabled after flashing
> a BIOS by EZ Flash. Fix the system hangs in POST (POST Code😀1)
> after flashing a BIOS by EZ Flash if a FSB800 CPU is used.
> Update Promise RAID boot ROM (1.00.0.37).
> Fix the system can't boot from Intel CSA 82547EI PCI LAN card.
>
> [ 1010 ]
> Update Intel RAID boot ROM to v3.5.0.2568 to support RAID 1 mode.
> Please also use the latest IAA to support this function.
> ********************
>
> Paul

>snip


Paul
Well I am making progress, slowly.
I have set the timings manually to 3-4-4-8 and CPU-Z confirms that this is
what its running at.
However I can only get the FSB to 233 up from the of 230 I was getting with
the SPD settings.
Should I try the 2.5-3-3-7 setting that the OCZ rep suggested?
Not much of a gain for all this work.
I am running the dram at 1:1.
I have tried the other setting of 5:4 and 3:2 and still could only get the
FSB to 233.
Should I return the dram to 5:4 or lower. It doesn't seem to help
I am running bios version 1016.001
I wish to thank you for your help, and I somewhat reluctant to ask for more
help as you have been very patient with me.
Thanks again
Ken'
 
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

In article <3N6dnfX176JMlS_fRVn-hg@rogers.com>, "Ken'"
<xyz@Mailinator.com> wrote:

>
> Paul
> Well I am making progress, slowly.
> I have set the timings manually to 3-4-4-8 and CPU-Z confirms that this is
> what its running at.
> However I can only get the FSB to 233 up from the of 230 I was getting with
> the SPD settings.
> Should I try the 2.5-3-3-7 setting that the OCZ rep suggested?
> Not much of a gain for all this work.
> I am running the dram at 1:1.
> I have tried the other setting of 5:4 and 3:2 and still could only get the
> FSB to 233.
> Should I return the dram to 5:4 or lower. It doesn't seem to help
> I am running bios version 1016.001
> I wish to thank you for your help, and I somewhat reluctant to ask for more
> help as you have been very patient with me.
> Thanks again
> Ken'
>

OK, since the lower memory ratios aren't getting you anywhere,
that suggests that the processor is holding you back. The
multiplier in the processor is locked. The exception to that
statement, is Asus added Lockfree to the 1018 or later BIOS.
That allows some of the higher end processors, with PRB=1,
to be operated with a multiplier of x14. That gives the ability
to set a higher FSB (and thus higher memory clock), for the
purpose of increasing memory bandwidth. No 2.8GHz processors
would do anything with LockFree, because the multiplier on
those is already x14.

A little more voltage might help the processor. Or a little
better cooling (assuming the processor is hitting 70C at
its current level of overclock).

Unfortunately, there are only two entries in

http://cpudatabase.com/index.cfm?action=search

for "Pentium 4 Prescott 2.8". One processor is doing 3.5GHz at
1.55V and the other is doing 3.8Ghz at 1.36V.
Due to the pollution of this database with nonsense overclocking
results, you need hundreds of entries in the database, to see
clear trends. The Prescott 3.0 does close to 4Ghz at 1.45 to 1.50V.
The Prescott 3.2 does close to 4GHz at 1.4 to 1.6V.

These are the 2.8Ghz processors in processorfinder.intel.com

1.25V-1.388V SL7PT E0 stepping 2.8Ghz
1.287V-1.400V SL7PR E0 stepping
1.287V-1.400V SL7PL E0 stepping
1.4V SL7KJ D0 stepping
1.287V-1.400V SL7KA D0 stepping
1.4V SL7J5 D0 stepping
1.25V-1.400V SL7E3 D0 stepping

According to the datasheet, max Vcore is 1.55V.

What Vcore voltage are you at currently ?
Try a bit more Vcore and see if the FSB will go further.

227MHz is where a motherboard gets stuck, if it doesn't have
AGP/PCI lock. I don't know if that is just a coincidence in
your case or not.

Get a copy of this version of clockgen from cpuid.com .
This might allow to to verify the clock frequencies being
used.

http://www.cpuid.org/cg.php?cgid=ICS952607

Paul
 
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

the cpu is getting too hot...it will hit the high 50's at boot alone,
even though the temp at desktop indicates something lower. Try some
advanced cooling solutions before you start ripping apart the system.
I peeked out at 3150 with my 2.8 with stock cooling, but I was able to
get some temp readings prior to a cold boot and cmoss reset...running
stable at 3 ghz until I can mod my case and airflow requirements...
FYI

On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:09:25 -0400, "Ken'" <xyz@Mailinator.com> wrote:

>
>"Paul" <nospam@needed.com> wrote in message
>news:nospam-1506051849010001@192.168.1.178...
>> In article <dcCdnfStLNHoOi3fRVn-1Q@rogers.com>, "Ken'"
>> <xyz@Mailinator.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>> My system is
>>> Asus P4C800-E deluxe
>>> 2.8 Prescott with Intec stock H/S fan
>>> 2x228 Ocz 4000ELDC-K ram
>>> 300 watt Sparkle power supply
>>> Asus 5700 video card
>>> Maxtor hard drive
>>> 1 CD ROM
>>> 1 DVD
>>> I have hit a rut in my overclocking.
>>> I posted here before and Paul helped me with a very compressive reply.
>>> He indicated that I should have no problem boosting the FSB to 250 or so.
>>> I can get no higher that 230, and I am wondering if the reason for that
>>> is
>>> my power supply is only 300 watts.
>>> Thanks
>>> Ken'
>>
>> Have you set "AGP/PCI Frequency (MHz)" [66.66/33.33] ?
>> That setting prevents the Northbridge from being overclocked.
>
> Yes
>
>> RAM getting enough volts ?
>
> 2.85
>
>>
>> You can check the power supply via the hardware monitor.
>> Either check the voltages in the BIOS or use Asus Probe
>> while booted into Windows. If your +12V is below +11.4V,
>> I'd be thinking about getting a better supply.
>
> Will check.
>>
>> Paul
>
>
>Thanks
>Ken'
>
 
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

ps: your generic psu should be replaced as well, your geforce card
alone will be putting a strain on it...a good quality 350 watt from
enermax should be more than adaquate and it won't break the bank...
FYI

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 00:23:49 GMT, timmy <bs@aol.com> wrote:

>the cpu is getting too hot...it will hit the high 50's at boot alone,
>even though the temp at desktop indicates something lower. Try some
>advanced cooling solutions before you start ripping apart the system.
>I peeked out at 3150 with my 2.8 with stock cooling, but I was able to
>get some temp readings prior to a cold boot and cmoss reset...running
>stable at 3 ghz until I can mod my case and airflow requirements...
>FYI
>
>On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:09:25 -0400, "Ken'" <xyz@Mailinator.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Paul" <nospam@needed.com> wrote in message
>>news:nospam-1506051849010001@192.168.1.178...
>>> In article <dcCdnfStLNHoOi3fRVn-1Q@rogers.com>, "Ken'"
>>> <xyz@Mailinator.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>> My system is
>>>> Asus P4C800-E deluxe
>>>> 2.8 Prescott with Intec stock H/S fan
>>>> 2x228 Ocz 4000ELDC-K ram
>>>> 300 watt Sparkle power supply
>>>> Asus 5700 video card
>>>> Maxtor hard drive
>>>> 1 CD ROM
>>>> 1 DVD
>>>> I have hit a rut in my overclocking.
>>>> I posted here before and Paul helped me with a very compressive reply.
>>>> He indicated that I should have no problem boosting the FSB to 250 or so.
>>>> I can get no higher that 230, and I am wondering if the reason for that
>>>> is
>>>> my power supply is only 300 watts.
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Ken'
>>>
>>> Have you set "AGP/PCI Frequency (MHz)" [66.66/33.33] ?
>>> That setting prevents the Northbridge from being overclocked.
>>
>> Yes
>>
>>> RAM getting enough volts ?
>>
>> 2.85
>>
>>>
>>> You can check the power supply via the hardware monitor.
>>> Either check the voltages in the BIOS or use Asus Probe
>>> while booted into Windows. If your +12V is below +11.4V,
>>> I'd be thinking about getting a better supply.
>>
>> Will check.
>>>
>>> Paul
>>
>>
>>Thanks
>>Ken'
>>
 
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

>snip
> OK, since the lower memory ratios aren't getting you anywhere,
> that suggests that the processor is holding you back. The
> multiplier in the processor is locked. The exception to that
> statement, is Asus added Lockfree to the 1018 or later BIOS.
> That allows some of the higher end processors, with PRB=1,
> to be operated with a multiplier of x14. That gives the ability
> to set a higher FSB (and thus higher memory clock), for the
> purpose of increasing memory bandwidth. No 2.8GHz processors
> would do anything with LockFree, because the multiplier on
> those is already x14.
>
> A little more voltage might help the processor. Or a little
> better cooling (assuming the processor is hitting 70C at
> its current level of overclock).
>
> Unfortunately, there are only two entries in
>
> http://cpudatabase.com/index.cfm?action=search
>
> for "Pentium 4 Prescott 2.8". One processor is doing 3.5GHz at
> 1.55V and the other is doing 3.8Ghz at 1.36V.
> Due to the pollution of this database with nonsense overclocking
> results, you need hundreds of entries in the database, to see
> clear trends. The Prescott 3.0 does close to 4Ghz at 1.45 to 1.50V.
> The Prescott 3.2 does close to 4GHz at 1.4 to 1.6V.
>
> These are the 2.8Ghz processors in processorfinder.intel.com
>
> 1.25V-1.388V SL7PT E0 stepping 2.8Ghz
> 1.287V-1.400V SL7PR E0 stepping
> 1.287V-1.400V SL7PL E0 stepping
> 1.4V SL7KJ D0 stepping
> 1.287V-1.400V SL7KA D0 stepping
> 1.4V SL7J5 D0 stepping
> 1.25V-1.400V SL7E3 D0 stepping
>
> According to the datasheet, max Vcore is 1.55V.
>
> What Vcore voltage are you at currently ?
> Try a bit more Vcore and see if the FSB will go further.
>
> 227MHz is where a motherboard gets stuck, if it doesn't have
> AGP/PCI lock. I don't know if that is just a coincidence in
> your case or not.
>
> Get a copy of this version of clockgen from cpuid.com .
> This might allow to to verify the clock frequencies being
> used.
>
> http://www.cpuid.org/cg.php?cgid=ICS952607
>
> Paul

>snip

Paul
I have conversed with a rep from the OCZ forum and he told me his old system
was the P4C800-E deluxe with a 2.8 Prescott.
He claimed that he reached 3.5Ghz with it but only after he changed his
power supply. He was unaware that my power supply was only 300 watts and as
soon as I told him this he said that had to be my problem. His old power
supply was a 450 watts and he claimed it was too small.
Prior to that he had me increase the cpu voltage to 1.5 volts and this
allowed me to reach a FSB speed of 235. This was achieved with timings of
2.5-3-3-7 and the dram set to 5:4.
I have always check my temps with Asus probe and Everest and it has never
gone over 60C even when running Prime 95, so I don't think that heat is my
problem.
I have decided to leave it for now until I can change my power supply, and I
will run Prime 95 and MemTest tomorrow to see how stable it is at these
settings.
Many thanks for the great help.
Ken'
 
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

In article <662dnXNFw9iHzi_fRVn-pg@rogers.com>, "Ken'"
<xyz@Mailinator.com> wrote:

>
> Paul
> I have conversed with a rep from the OCZ forum and he told me his old system
> was the P4C800-E deluxe with a 2.8 Prescott.
> He claimed that he reached 3.5Ghz with it but only after he changed his
> power supply. He was unaware that my power supply was only 300 watts and as
> soon as I told him this he said that had to be my problem. His old power
> supply was a 450 watts and he claimed it was too small.
> Prior to that he had me increase the cpu voltage to 1.5 volts and this
> allowed me to reach a FSB speed of 235. This was achieved with timings of
> 2.5-3-3-7 and the dram set to 5:4.
> I have always check my temps with Asus probe and Everest and it has never
> gone over 60C even when running Prime 95, so I don't think that heat is my
> problem.
> I have decided to leave it for now until I can change my power supply, and I
> will run Prime 95 and MemTest tomorrow to see how stable it is at these
> settings.
> Many thanks for the great help.
> Ken'

When you run Prime95, run Asus Probe at the same time, and see
how your Sparkle power supply is running. It will be interesting
to see whether the new supply manages better output and makes
a difference to your overclocking.

While you are getting that supply, take a look at some of
the threads here. This will give you some perspective on
what is at the top of the overclocker pyramid.

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=56

Paul
 
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (More info?)

"Paul" <nospam@needed.com> wrote in message
news:nospam-1706050306350001@192.168.1.178...
> In article <662dnXNFw9iHzi_fRVn-pg@rogers.com>, "Ken'"
> <xyz@Mailinator.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Paul
>> I have conversed with a rep from the OCZ forum and he told me his old
>> system
>> was the P4C800-E deluxe with a 2.8 Prescott.
>> He claimed that he reached 3.5Ghz with it but only after he changed his
>> power supply. He was unaware that my power supply was only 300 watts and
>> as
>> soon as I told him this he said that had to be my problem. His old power
>> supply was a 450 watts and he claimed it was too small.
>> Prior to that he had me increase the cpu voltage to 1.5 volts and this
>> allowed me to reach a FSB speed of 235. This was achieved with timings of
>> 2.5-3-3-7 and the dram set to 5:4.
>> I have always check my temps with Asus probe and Everest and it has never
>> gone over 60C even when running Prime 95, so I don't think that heat is
>> my
>> problem.
>> I have decided to leave it for now until I can change my power supply,
>> and I
>> will run Prime 95 and MemTest tomorrow to see how stable it is at these
>> settings.
>> Many thanks for the great help.
>> Ken'
>
> When you run Prime95, run Asus Probe at the same time, and see
> how your Sparkle power supply is running. It will be interesting
> to see whether the new supply manages better output and makes
> a difference to your overclocking.
>
> While you are getting that supply, take a look at some of
> the threads here. This will give you some perspective on
> what is at the top of the overclocker pyramid.
>
> http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=56
>
> Paul


Paul
I always run Probe with Prime95 and I have the 12 volt set to sound a
warning if the voltage drops below 3%. ( this is the lowest it will go )
It has sounded only once that I know of. I also have it set to record the
voltage output and I scan it looking for red lines.
So 3% of 12 would be 11.64 and it has been below it at least once.
Thanks
Ken'