Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (
More info?)
AJ wrote:
> "Rob Stow" <rob.stow.nospam@shaw.ca> wrote in message news
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p]()
mpVc.161582$J06.95121@pd7tw2no...
>
>>Me wrote:
>>
>>>"Rob Stow" <rob.stow.nospam@shaw.ca> wrote in message news:Qx4Vc.151895$J06.144696@pd7tw2no...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Me wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Rob Stow" <rob.stow@sasktel.net> wrote in message news:10g6688na9ciuc3@corp.supernews.com...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Since you don't need 3D, a quad-head Matrox G200 or
>>>>G450 would do you nicely. However, they cost an
>>>>arm and a leg.
>>>>
>>>>A much cheaper solution is to use a pair of dual-head
>>>>G450's or a G450 and a G550 - either both PCI or one
>>>>PCI and one AGP. I believe Matrox also recently
>>>>started selling a PCI version of one of their
>>>>P-series cards.
>>>
>>>
>>>4 monitors would be too much though. 3 would form a nice
>>>symmetrical viewing pattern: front, left, right.
>>
>>A pair of dual-head video cards in no way requires you to
>>attach a monitor to all four "heads". 4 would be the
>>upper limit - nothing stopping you from using 3, 2, or
>>even just 1 monitor.
>
>
> I realize that.
>
>
>>>The G450 PCI
>>>is what I have now (kinda slow on my 400 MHz AMD machine
>>>but nice text). I was going to get the P650 (but I don't think that
>>>will do 1600x1200x3 and that's what I want). Now if I could use
>>>the motherboard's built-in graphics AND the 2 G450 ports, I'd
>>>be all set (soon I'll have a new Intel motherboard)!
>>
>>Give it a try and see if it works.
>
>
> My current board in the BIOS setup has an option to choose
> either a PCI video card or the onboard graphics.
What, no AGP slot ? Cheap board.
In any case, that BIOS option is most probably just
for selecting the primary display adapter. If you
select PCI, it will probably disable the integrated
AGP video, but if you select the integrated AGP it
should not affect your ability to also use a PCI card.
>
>
>>The Intel/Matrox combo
>>might not play together nicely or they might play nicely
>>with some OSes and not others.
>
>
> Has anyone tried this and gotten it to work? (On-board vid plus
> PCI or AGP vid).
>
Yup. The system I am currently using has integrated
nVidia GeForce AGP video. Just for you I also added
a Matrox G400 PCI dualhead. Works fine with one monitor
on the integrated AGP and one on the G400. Can't test
a 3 monitor setup because I only have 2 monitors here
at home. OS = W2K Pro. Can only make it work with
separate desktops for each monitor. (Single desktop
across both monitors works if I put both on
the G400 and disable the integrated AGP.)
Note that integrated AGP video plus a card in an AGP
slot will never work. Simply a limitation of the AGP
standard.
>
>>Nothing stopping you from
>>later disabling the Intel video and adding another Matrox
>>card if that is what it takes to get you your 3 monitor
>>setup.
>
>
> That's probably what I'll have to do. But maybe I'll get the
> P650 (still passively cooled) and use that until I accumulate a 3rd
> monitor and then add my G450 to the setup (I just found out from
> a monitor repair guy that my 2nd monitor "isn't worth fixing" so I've
> just one now).
>
>
>>>I wonder if having 3 CRTs pointing at me poses some kind of
>>>health risk (?).
>>
>>I know someone who spent a decade in front of a 4 x 21"
>>setup until the prices for large LCDs came down enough
>>for his company to replace the CRTs. He had problems
>>with kinks in his neck when he had to spend a lot of
>>time looking at the two upper monitors (they were arranged
>>in a 2 x 2 pattern), but that was about the extent of his
>>health problems.
>
>
> I think only scientific study/facts are valid for this concern (that is,
> I know someone who has smoked for 40 years, 3 packs a day
> and is still "fine". But I tend to heed the surgeon general's
> warning anyway). I have a feeling the newer TCO certified
> monitors cause little problems though.
>
I intended my health comment to be tongue-in-cheek.
Some things just don't work in text because you can't see
the other guy going nudge-nudge, wink-wink.
--
Reply to rob.stow.nospam@shaw.ca
Do not remove anything.