Phenom 2 920 and 940 Benchmarks

Page 11 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.


Yikes! Guess I'll wait for the 40nm shrink then. My GTX8800 already pumps too much hot air into the room during summertime.
 


Really? I saw the image over at Engadget but it had only one PCB board. Of course, that board had only one GPU on it so I guess there's another one peeled away. I did confirm the 289 watts however...

 


then dont bother with a multi-gpu card from any manufacturer for a while. the ability to heat a small room in inherent on these platforms whether its a single card multi-gpu or a dual card multi-gpu. the alternative would be liquid cooling and that isnt a bad idea if your willing to fan out 500+ dollars for a video card anyways.
 


Until there are significant improvements to thermals and more consistent Crossfire support, I'll not spend another $450 on a dual GPU card. Once was enough. I'm planning on replacing mine with a 4850 1 gig, no change where Crossfire works, but a big improvement where it doesn't.

With my luck AMD will have a $85 card out in June that the $169 4850 1 gig. That's basically what happened last time. Right now, I'd prefer more information on what ATI's coming out with than Phenom II news.



Except for those of us who's boards support it. I didn't expect my Gigabyte 780G board to support it, but it does. That makes me want to switch the triple core to my son's ASUS 780G board and go for the Phenom II.

I still may not do it. I'll have to see how it compares once the NDA is lifted. I'd rather spend the money on a new GPU and Acer 21" 1920 x 1080 LCD.
 


I might fit in with conservatives, but I'm the opposite of a libertarian. I'm a social conservative/fiscal liberal.

Yet, I believe in a separation of church and state that would be considered radical by most, so as to end the legal culture wars and let everyone get on with their lives. A sort of "believe and let believe" attitude.



I'm for a conservative 15% flat tax on individuals, with a modest national sales tax. That puts me in the conservative camp, but what puts me in the liberal camp is that I want fictitious persons (i.e. corporations) to pay a similar amount of taxes that they paid 60 or so years ago.

The corporate tax rate might be high on paper, but it's much lower in actuality because the tax code allows corporations loopholes to send wealth to foreign subsidiaries which then return the wealth as untaxed foreign profit. I would not be averse to a flat 25% corporate income tax and a flat 20% small business, partnership tax.

I want government to insure that everyone has health care, either through employer funded insurance or through government backed insurance that's affordable. I'm not looking for a Brit styled National Health, or a Canadian one payer system but something that covers people when they're unemployed, when they're contractors and when they're in poor retail style health plans that have far too high deductables.

I'm for people first, because, in my religious view, people exist forever. Countries, governments and corporations do not. I want to see immigration to this country from Mexico, but legal and with full protection in the workplace for immigrant workers.

I'm only a nativist in the sense that I oppose certain Leftists in academia and politics denigrating America's primary culture, which is one that I subscribe to. Immigrants of all religions and cultures ended up becoming assimilated to America's culture, the problem now is that some on the Left anticipate an "American Union" from Canada to Argentina with the first step the "reconquista" of the U.S by illegal immigrants.



I can assure you that corporations are just as inefficient. I'm not a believer in the myth that private companies can accomplish everything for profit and more cheaply than government. Only certain services.

I'm especially against privatization of the support of our military Halliburton style. I'm against mercenaries protecting our diplomats instead of citizen-soldier Marines.



I'm not opposed to globalization, only to mercantilism. The downside of globalization is that workers in places like China live in factory dorms far from their families instead of in apartments or modest houses with their families.

Textile jobs left the U.S. for Central American locations like Honduras, now they're leaving Honduras for China. If the corporations could get cheaper reliable labor in Africa (they've tried) then the Chinese would lose their factory jobs too. IMHO, it's bad for the environment for food and products to be shipped half way around the globe because transportation costs are kept artificially low and because labor is cheaper. We should eat as local as possible and buy locally where possible.



I'm neither a reactionary or a post modernist. I realize that we won't have many factory jobs in our future, maybe not many tech jobs either. Eventually, they'll run out of places to ship the factories off to, but by then robotics will probably make factory jobs obsolete. Unless we find ways of educating a world wide population to earn through creativity and put less emphasis on artificial wealth like dodgy mortages bundled and marketed as securities, we won't have real prosperity.

Ideas, concepts and entertainment I can agree with, but not brands. Only when a brand is a guide to quality (i.e. ASUS or Gigabyte vs. PC Chips) is it worth anything. The way shoddy goods are being shipped around the world with brand names, I'd just as soon save money for computer upgrades by buying retro hippie clothes in thrift stores and buying shoes at Payless. The last time I got a name brand shoe, it didn't last me any longer than the cheap sneakers I prefer.

I don't know what to call myself (other than Jewish Christian). Am I a communitarian? A moderate? Labels don't matter. I do know that I'm neither a communist or a fascist, neither a libertine or a libertarian. Still, ideas, like behavior, exists on a continuum and labels rarely express who an individual really is at heart.
 


it does that from time to time but jaydee, dattmir ir rangers come along with some new found reviews and it jumps back on track.
 


Turpit got on an economics post and I responded to Turpit, then azxcvbnm321 responded to me. Threads here got derailed by many people discussing the economy, political philosophy etc. recently. There's not much tech wise to discuss about Phenom II that hasn't been said already; at least not until we get accurate and independent reviews from Anandtech, Tom's, Xbit Labs etc.

I apologize for my part in derailing the thread. Turpit's a moderator, he's probably allowed to... :na:



I'm not buying in June. I'm buying next gen in September. What I'd been debating was a cheap 4850 to hold me over till then. I have the 3870x2 back and working but I don't think I'm getting Crossfire in LOTRO, so it's only 3870 performance, and that's not what I paid for.

Last time I buy a dual GPU card until every site agrees that in every game the dual GPU works in Crossfire (or SLI if I ever go back to Nvidia).
 
There are plenty of Phenom II threads on this board, but few that discuss economic/social/political events.

I'm for a conservative 15% flat tax on individuals, with a modest national sales tax. That puts me in the conservative camp, but what puts me in the liberal camp is that I want fictitious persons (i.e. corporations) to pay a similar amount of taxes that they paid 60 or so years ago.

Yipsi, we actually agree on many things. I also would like a lower tax rate on individuals, but I think your 15% flat tax is unrealistic if you're going to ask for universal health care. Someone has to pay for health care and it is expensive. Making it free would be even more expensive overall, wouldn't you upgrade to a i7 if it were free? As for corporations, I agree that tax loopholes and subsidies/incentive packages should be severely curtailed. The farming industry, the steel industry, and the energy industry costs us billions per year. Our corporate tax rate is actually one of the highest in the world, I would eliminate these loopholes and reduce the corporate taxes. I hope you realize the owners of these corporations are double taxed, once through the corporate tax and then again when they get dividends or sell shares through individual taxes. We're pretty much in agreement overall.


I'm only a nativist in the sense that I oppose certain Leftists in academia and politics denigrating America's primary culture, which is one that I subscribe to. Immigrants of all religions and cultures ended up becoming assimilated to America's culture, the problem now is that some on the Left anticipate an "American Union" from Canada to Argentina with the first step the "reconquista" of the U.S by illegal immigrants.


Absolutely agree. As an immigrant myself, I understand the importance of shared culture and values. It's what keeps this country together, and why the border is more than just an imaginary line. Other countries have their own cultures and beliefs, if we lose our shared values and core principles then this ceases to be a country or an Union. Although you mention communitarian, you don't sound like a socialist--it doesn't seem like you want to end private ownership, just more government involvement. The private sector isn't perfect, in fact, financial crises like this one are necessary for capitalism to function. Speculation can only be tamed by severe losses, gamblers and speculators are taught not to overextend by losing their shirts. They remember and so speculative excesses are curbed in the future. Without these losses or the possibility of them, there would be no "risk", only reward in the risk/reward decisions we all have to make. It is a mistake to believe that capitalism is broken just because we get periodic crises or recessions. They cannot be avoided, despite all the promises from politicians and government, I GUARANTEE we will have another financial crisis in the future. They simply cannot be avoided, like hurricanes and earthquakes we should recognize them as a natural part of the system.

The government is better at providing some services and goods. We don't want private enforcement of the law because favoritism could come into play. We also don't want individuals to provide national defense. Whose B-2 bomber should be used this time? But these cases are rare because government has a huge disadvantage in information. The profit motive and market prices are important because they give us a lot of information. How would a bureaucrat in Washington figure out if the service he's providing is a good value? If there was a better and cheaper option? This is complicated so I'll only use a few examples. How would the government figure out if giving a 78 year old man a hip replacement surgery is "worth it"? Let's mix up the situation and say he has cancer and doctors estimate he has 2 years to live, the procedure costs $40000. Well in the private sector, the man can determine himself if it is worth it or not. Would he rather have $40000 to leave to his children or spend in another way, or would he rather get the surgery. Government has no easy way to answer this question. And how does government know it is doing a good job or not? How does it figure out if spending $1 on some improvement will be worth the cost? A company like Intel can know because if profits rise more than $1, then it is worth it.

Finally, this brings me to branding. Those who outsource cheap products are hurting their brands. This strategy will lose them a lot of money in the long run. Mattel was, and is stupid to outsource their toys. Their brand is worth billions, it is why people will buy a Mattel product over a generic one and that makes the company a lot of money. If they were to lose that advantage, then the company would suffer and become just another generic toy producer. In other words, brands require their owners to offer a good value to customers or else the brand dies. Saving $1 to outsource and produce an inferior product will cost more than $1 in the long run and isn't worth it. To tie everything together, there is no way government can "know" this information since they don't operate with a profit motive. That's why the government is so bad at doing so many things, it just doesn't have the information to make the right choices, there is no way for them to figure it out easily, there is no bottom line like with Intel or Dell.
 
this is getting quite offtopic but yet its interesting were this disscusion is leading i like to read some of it. but atleast i can guarantee you AMD won't go bankrupt soon. the spin off has the green light it needed http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/256785-10-clear-spinoff and this means they will have enough buget around march april when the deal completes to get back on the track and build those fabs. yes we won't see immidiate result but we will afther about 2 or 3 years and if everything went well and has been build then you will notice die shrinks might go alot faster then they go now at amd. i hope we can see its 4Q results soon. it might not be good yet due to the global rescession we are in to right now but 1Q 2009 might end them up getting even finaly. atleast there best cpu cash market, the Server market is doing alot better with shanghai then with barcelona and desktop seems to get back on the track soon enough.
while mobile and ultra portable aren't doing bad at all.

 


Not universal health care like the Brit's National Health, but universal health coverage for preventive and catastrophic care (plus for all children). That's like requiring everyone who drives and owns a car to have car insurance. A subsidized program like with flood insurance is what I'm thinking of, with reasonable deductibles.



Shareholders might be double taxed if they sell shares, but most people own shares through mutual funds. That includes pension plans. I don't see corporate upper management as double taxed when they sell shares of that are part of their perks.

We have the highest tax rate in the world only on paper. That tax rate is seldom paid. The idea of flat taxes is that it does not allow for all the tax breaks given now. Once the recession's over, I want to see vibrant capitalism with more regulation and hope to see flat tax rates.

I don't pay much in taxes as the single wage earner for my three person family. Most of my weekend scheduled overtime is taxed much higher than my regular income, but it comes back to me at refund time, which is nice for computer upgrades and stuff for my wife and son, not to mention buying plane tickets for vacation, yet I'd rather we all pay 15% and I get taxed for regular and overtime at the same rate, without anything other than 3 personal deductions. Data center work is okay but not lucrative. :lol:

My doctor relative is considering a job with a $28,000 pay cut for lifestyle reasons (she can still afford her home etc with that as a single Mom), but she pays taxes almost equaling my $44,000 income whereas I get almost $2,500 in refunds. If she got taxed at 15%, then she'd get to keep more and wouldn't be looking for all the tax breaks that lessen the amount she pays.

There are hedge fund managers who make millions, even after the recession hit home in November and they pay less taxes than I do. Get the picture? Three levels of hard working people but me, at lower middle class gets refunds. My relative at middle class pays almost as much as I earn on the average year and someone who earns millions pays virtually nothing because of loopholes.

The same's true for business. My wife used to manage a costume shop decades ago and the owner paid all sorts of taxes. Corporations that offshore profits to return them as taxed at a very minimal rate by some Caribbean island pay less in proportion to their profits than a small business owner. We need fairness where everyone is on the same playing field, and that's where a flat tax comes in.




My problem with Mexico is that they take the billions sent home by illegal immigrants as a right and they teach their school children to still be angry over a war in 1840 that was basically fought over Texas. The American south gave up taking their loss in the Civil War too seriously, the Mexicans need to lighten up and stop taking the reconquest of Spain as a paradigm for Mexico getting the American southwest back.

Since illegals are all over the country now, it looks like the radicals down there want more than what they lost in that long ago war. At worst, Mexico is on the verge of becoming a failed state like Pakistan, and we can't blame hippie drug use for it all; especially since the U.S. did not intervene politically there like with Central America. Mexico was always a strong central state and was never a banana republic maintained by corporation mercenaries.



I'm for private ownership with strong government regulation. I'm a communitarian in the social sense. People live forever in the religious sense and fictitious persons like corporations do not. So I support community between real people and find that more important than ownership.

This time, they're grabbing the shirts off our backs and aren't losing theirs. When a guy goes from 1.3 billion in paper wealth to 300 million in real wealth then I don't think he's lost anything, but people laid off in the downturn, or taking pay cuts, or being made contractors instead of employees with benefits are losing.

That's why I think it's time for another New Deal.




It's not the B-2 bombers that are privatized, but all the support services and diplomatic guards. We don't need mercs escorting our convoys, we don't need private contractors doing shoddy electrical work at bases that get soldiers killed, and we don't need private guards protecting diplomats when that's a Marine's job.




How would a just above minimum wage insurance company employee doing scripted responses figure out if it's a better value? The private health insurance field is broken. My doctor relative hates it. Patients hate it and it's only better when compared to Medicaid (where doctors can opt out), or to nothing at all.




Yet, they still do it because they want cheap labor. They end up in a relationship to workers at the third world and Chinese factories similar to that between Great Britain and her colonies in the 18th and early 19th centuries. Mercantilism was exploitation then and it's exploitation now. It used to be that raw materials came from overseas to be manufactured here, now manufacturing's done there on the cheap such that shipping it around the world is no issue, even if it's a $2.00 dollar store item.

I stopped buying brands long ago when I noticed how shoddy they were, but with some products like toys, the seasonal aspect means that branding is not a big issue. Kids want the toy of the year, not the brand of the toymaker. Back when I was 6 I received a red headed GI Joe knock off with legs that did not move. His arms did and he had a pistol. My friends with real GI Joes laughed at my toy. I still remember that! :lol:

Still, wish I had that knock off as a quirky collectible.

Later, have to get to work overnight at the data center.
 


No problem mate. Peace ![/quotemsg]


Radnor, Im sorry I havent responed sooner.....but you know....work is work, and its that time of the 18 month cycle form my organization....we have inspections out the behind for the next month and a half, and unfortunately for me, one of the focal points of those inspections are my department, so....

I dont want to do a flipant reply......not my style, and I enjoy discusion as well.....you deserve better than a quikie. So, I'll come back around this weekend maybe when I can give it the time it will take.


But I did want to pop in quick with some news. I see someone already got the news on the aproval of the foundry, but I havent seen (granted, Im in a rush so I didnt look too hard) any one report on this stuff. 2 stories, grim.

1) Intel has issued a second warning on its Q4 earnings. They have now lowered projections down to 8.2 billion.

Intel warns again on Q4; shares fall


2) Global semiconductor sales fell 9.9% in november...further than expected.

EARNINGS PREVIEW: US Semiconductor Cos See Demand Sink In 4Q

As everyon knows by now, oil prices fell 12% today on a significantly larger than expected reseves report. Analysts predicted a 1.5 million barrel reserve this time around, but the actual reserve was over 6.7 million barrels, indicating that the recession is continiuing unabated despite last weeks market rallies. Coupled with todays unemployment report, Intels warnings and the M$ scare as well as some other stuff, the crude surplus sent the market down no small amount.

What has not been mentioned so far IRT crude prices is the impact of heating oil.....Traditionally, the market looks for price fluctions in winter......colder winter = higher crude prices, warmer winters = lower crude prices. The impact of winter is nothing compared to consumer demand for transportation fuels--- mogas, diesel, avgas, but to have a cold winter (as our northen bretheren have been having this year) without the commodities traders looking to cash in on crude distilates and adding some extra spice to crude trading is a tad.....abnormal.
 


Anandtech's usually the first place I go for reviews of new hardware and I thought Anand did a decent job on the Phenom II review. I would have liked to see a few benchmarks with the chips overclocked but I'm hoping that will come in a later review. Phenom II is definitely a huge improvement for what is basically a die shrink. It doesn't quite live up to the hype that I've seen spewed about these forums the past few months, but it is a decent chip. I don't see it winning over many Yorkfield owners but it's definitely a worthy upgrade for anyone with a compatible motherboard. It performs about as well as I had hoped and AMD's pricing seems reasonable. If I were building a PC today it would be something I'd consider (though I'd probably wait for the AM3 versions).

P.S. How dare you read the Anandtech review. As an AMD fan you should know that Anand is completely biased towards Intel. At least that's what the tools at AMDZone say, probably because Anand's benchmark results for the past couple of years show that intel chips are faster than amd ones. 😛
 
+1 rangers
they need to lower the price to grab up market beyond upgrade paths for AM2 owners and the crowd that has waited for these for their next build (which they could have some fall off that had unrealistic expectations). it looks to be a great chip and look forward to ordering the 940 next Friday and see how it stacks up against the e8400 system right next to it.