Phenom II X4 955: AMD's Dragon Platform Evolves

Status
Not open for further replies.

inmytaxi

Distinguished
Dec 9, 2008
73
0
18,630
0
Why call a 955 $255 plus 790GX mb $110 plus 4 gb ram $41 is $500, when it's actually $410 before shipping and rebates, which about cancel out? And that's just picking off the cheapest at newegg and not price shopping, which might knock it below $400.

Not to mention the six months on the market the other set up has had to drop in price ...
 

inmytaxi

Distinguished
Dec 9, 2008
73
0
18,630
0
Of course, even at NewEgg, the i7 is still just a benny more, at $280 for the i7, $84 for 1600 6gb ram and $200 for a MB. What's, $564 before ship and rebates, knock $50 if you get the i7 at microcenter, and another $20 on real cost after nit picking out shipping and rebates ... and settle for 1333 ram ... you're within fifty bucks!!!

If it wasn't for that Nvidia issue with the i7 ...
Hell,
 

inmytaxi

Distinguished
Dec 9, 2008
73
0
18,630
0
Hell, you can knock seventy off the hundred dollar price diff. with an open box motherboard for one thirty instead of twoo hundred.

Nice processor, but until the price drop comes the only reason to buy it is if you're upgrading. If you're doing a clean sweep it's the i7 all the way.

 

gsacks

Distinguished
Jul 31, 2008
176
0
18,680
0
[citation][nom]inmytaxi[/nom]Hell, you can knock seventy off the hundred dollar price diff. with an open box motherboard for one thirty instead of twoo hundred.Nice processor, but until the price drop comes the only reason to buy it is if you're upgrading. If you're doing a clean sweep it's the i7 all the way.[/citation]

Not fair. Don't compare open box prices to new prices. If you want to buy used/refurb/reconditioned/open box, then compare the prices against the same used/refurb/reconditioned/open box equivalent for the other platform. Otherwise, you are fudging your numbers.
 

trevorvdw

Distinguished
Feb 13, 2007
143
0
18,680
0
"The only standout in this clumsy console port is AMD’s Phenom II X3 720, which lags at both 1680x1050 and 1920x1200. The rest of the processors serve up reasonably close performance, per what we’ve come to expect from Grand Theft Auto 4."

Yeah that whole less than 10% behind the i7 920 is totally lagging and not close in performance... who writes this drivel?
 
G

Guest

Guest
for gamers: seriously, get the 720BE and oc it to death. then spend your money on VIDEO CARD(S)... that's what's important here!
 

boudy

Distinguished
Mar 13, 2009
498
0
18,790
2
[citation][nom]pace[/nom]for gamers: seriously, get the 720BE and oc it to death. then spend your money on VIDEO CARD(S)... that's what's important here![/citation]

For budget gamers? If someone is a addict to gaming (aka Gamer), they would probably spend a little more on the CPU and still get a good video card. Of course, on these games, you really dont need anything more than a 720 and a good video card, but there are more hardware intensive games than these.
 

cangelini

Contributing Editor
Editor
Jul 4, 2008
1,878
9
19,795
4
[citation][nom]Why_Me[/nom]Why is it that Crysis wasn't on there ?[/citation]

Why,

Crysis is crazy GPU-bound. It doesn't add much useful data to a CPU review--expect to see it back in the graphics story I'm writing right now, though!
 

RazberyBandit

Distinguished
Dec 25, 2008
2,303
0
19,960
93
While the 955 was not the whopping jump in performance over the 940 I had hoped it might be, nor is it showing any signs of latching onto the i7's coattails in many regards, it shows a step in the right direction for AMD by finally offering a solid X4 AM3 option to the X3 710 & 720, and the underwhelming X4 810. With AM2+ users able to use any of these processors (mind you, BIOS update usually required), AMD has shown it's continued ability to offer solutions that ease users into another new platform. While that's nice, some may argue they'd rather see huge leaps in performance that require hardware change, rather than smaller performance gains that do not. I find myself on the fence with that one...

PI think I'll wait to take my AM2+ board into the realm of AM3 CPUs, specifically the 720 or 955, just a little while longer. Mind you, this is despite my X2 5000+ CPU bottleneck and knowing that any of these CPU's would offer a major performance increase. My biggest concern being whether or not the 920 and 940 are the final kings of AM2+, and that the 955 might be the king of AM3 for quite a long time, as well as what else a complete change to AM3 would bring (aside from DDR3).

I'm also concerned that perhaps in order to catch those i7 coattails (hopefully even surpass) I mentioned earlier, AMD has to give up on their easy transition from socket to socket approach and make a more significant change. Since you can only squeeze so much water out of a sponge before it's dry, I'm curious to know how much more water is left in AMD's AM2/2+/3 easy transition platform(s?) before it goes dry.
 

cangelini

Contributing Editor
Editor
Jul 4, 2008
1,878
9
19,795
4
Raz,

You'd be safe at least through the second half of 2010 (that's as far as the roadmaps shown to Tom's Hardware extend). At least into Q3, you're still looking at AM3.
 

spearhead

Distinguished
Apr 22, 2008
120
0
18,680
0
phenom 955 Shows its theeth. more importment all 2m+ cpu's are now aproaching bargain prices. 178 euro for 940 here in the netherlands now this was the old 920 price point. hell ye you can build an awsome system with 940 and the radeon 4980 and the samsung t220 for around just below 900 euro now :D forget about i7 you can easily have xfire for the premium on the amd setup. perhaps 2x 4830 might even outweights a sinlge radeon 4890 that should roughly save you about 30-40 euro still need to see some benchmarks tough but AMD provides good competition now and most of all these cpu's might get along wiht I5 as well since I5 is meant to be slower then i7. the diffrence between ph II and i7 920 is just a bare few % now so ph II should be very compatitive with core i5 as well .
 

EQPlayer

Distinguished
Jan 31, 2002
230
0
18,680
0
From the way AMD's looking, if you're worried about a quick socket jump, it ought not be much of a concern... it seems their next major leap in performance, Bulldozer (which I would assume will come with a new socket / platform) won't be out for some time (early 2011 at best), and until then AM3 will likely remain king. Then again, perhaps we'll find ourselves with a consumer version of the 6-core Istanbul that will require a new socket before Bulldozer. Who knows, really.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Pleaseeeeeeeeee, evolve and drop those ancient WINZIP and WINRAR. Use free open source 7-zip in your benchmark, which is more advanced, multi-threaded, has higher compression ratio.
 

grayskunk

Distinguished
Apr 23, 2009
4
0
18,510
0
EQPlayer - Yes but they compare power consumption with the Q9950 in price and the Q9550S in power consumption, just a small error was pointing out
 

grayskunk

Distinguished
Apr 23, 2009
4
0
18,510
0
EQPlayer - Yes but they compare power consumption with the Q9950 in price and the Q9550S in power consumption, just a small error was pointing out
 

cangelini

Contributing Editor
Editor
Jul 4, 2008
1,878
9
19,795
4
Gray--the performance was intended to represent the Q9550 alone. Because we included power results, full disclosure was required throughout the story; however, that was the only difference. The real comparison needs to be Phenom II X4 955 and Core 2 Quad Q9550. Priced close to $400, the Q9550S is really in a different class and intended for an entirely different customer, in my opinion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS