PSU tier list 2.0

Page 259 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
That's not even remotely true. Not in the larger picture of things. It might be the lower end models among the ones WE commonly recommend, but it's the vast majority among all the models and platforms that exist from all the OEMs and re-branded units out there. And I would not exactly call the M12II and S12II models, or the other units based on that platform like the High current gamers, low end. Old designs maybe, but not actually low end.

They work perfectly fine in systems that don't require individually regulated rails, AND, there are a lot of them still out there. For example, any Ryzen system would work just fine with one of them in it.
 
Well it only really applies to Haswells or newer Intel cpu's. In indo-asian markets, lga1155 is still quite popular, and thats a hefty dose of sales. You don't find the same low power limitations in the amd cpus either, another decent chunk of sales now with Ryzen. So worldwide sales of group regulated designs is going to be prevalent until they become more expensive to manufacture than dc-dc designs. Corsair (bless their hearts) is trying to make that happen as they do have worldwide marketing, but there's also a good chunk of cheapo-Chinese brands that aren't going to change designs in a hurry. It's going to be a good while yet before group regulated designs are done with.
 


They are lower end compared to the current models available by the same makers. (That doesn't mean they are junk)

You used Seasonic as an example, the M12ii and S12ii are lower end than the current Focus's and Prime's as an example. Exception would be the 750W and above versions of the M12ii that aren't group regulated designs.

The G Series and X Series are discontinued, but they are still higher end than the M12ii and S12ii.
 


More high mid range really, but that is splitting hairs.

Still a lot better than a GTX 1050. 😀
 


GTX 1050 - Low end
GTX 1050TI - Low End
GTX 1060 - Mid Range
GTX 1070 - High Mid Range (Only because it's 30% faster than a GTX 1060 and a lot slower than the GTX 1080 so it's in it's own class.)
GTX 1070Ti - High End (Fills the gap between the GTX 1070 and GTX 1080)
GTX 1080 and 1080Ti - High End

But then the GTX 1080 and GTX 1080Ti will likely be Mid Range cards next year after the new ones come out. (remains to be seen though)

 


No no no you got it all wrong. It goes like this:

GTX 1050 - 86% low end, 14% mid range
GTX 1050TI - Lowish Midish
GTX 1060 - Mid
GTX 1070 - Was high end until Nvidia demoted it by releasing 20 more Titans. Now it's 90% high 10% mid
GTX 1070Ti - As close to high end as Disney is to advertising Star Wars on bananas
GTX 1080 - High end
GTX 1080Ti - Super high
GTX Titan - Must be too high to spend the money
 


Discussion threads don't have a Best Answer button.
 


C6 and C7 are overlapping. When the package is in C7, the cores are in C6.

C7 existed before Haswell.
 
There only seems to have been a single review of that whole series, but it's moderately positive.

https://www.kitguru.net/components/power-supplies/zardon/cooler-master-masterwatt-650-power-supply-review/

Downside is Teapo capacitors (primary rated at 85C rather than 105C), but electrical performance is decent (sub-2% regulation, under half of ATX limit for ripple, doesn't mind crossloading). It's not the most detailed review so I wouldn't be surprised if others could find a few other small flaws, but it seems like an adequate budget unit. As long as it's budget priced, anyway. Certainly not a dumpster fire.
 


Maybe, but none of the data sheets show that it is implemented. All gen1, 2 and 3 core-I data sheets that I looked at on the Intel website show C6 but not C7 in the processor states sections.
 
C6=C7 at the core level. Package level C6 is the lowest power state with a PCIe GPU. Package C7 requires the IGP or switchable graphics. CPU will determine PC6 or PC7 automatically. Package C-states are also resolution dependent when on IGP - very large resolutions and multi-mon displays may be limited to C3 or C2.

That's what I found. Since pretty much nobody ever uses the IGP, it's pretty much moot I think.
 


IGP is used more than dedicated graphics.
 

Perhaps, but friends don't let friends buy Coolermaster. Unless your market is extremely limited (I'm so sorry!), there is always a better choice.
 
Oh wow. I hadn't read that article. That's going to be a mess. Lots of people having their new HDDs not working for no immediately obvious reason. Others resorting to Molex-SATA power adaptors, and we all know how reliable those tend to be...

What a stupid way to change the spec.
 



Unless Intel screwed up the data sheets for Gens 1, 2 AND 3, then all Gens prior to 4th gen Haswell Core-I processors do NOT use the C7 state at the package OR core level.


2i0vh49.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.