Sound all issues you think are there, as detailed and structured as possible, don't just say 'there are issues'. Preferably also make suggestions on how you think they should be fixed.
I meant the difference between grey and black is less noticeable n light mode, as in, the colors are even harder to see.
Blame default color palette. Well i wanted to revisit colors at some point anyway, it's not hard, just find-replace for RGB codes but i guess since people liked variant D and i did too (we still have to cast a vote in the team tho and folk at LTT actually seems to like current version more, go figure) we might as well just get rid of gray, and other colors aren't as problematic.
lack of info
quoting the methodology:
We'll gladly take that.
Yes, Aris did a review for Kitguru on 850W SKU and there are a whole bunch of reviews for lower wattages on other sites (all listed in the spreadsheet).
We had to paint a line somewhere on ripple, TX-m just happened to be out of limits by 3mV, and it's not the only one. If we'll see that EVGA GT also has >50mV ripple it would be detiered too, that's why we require detailed reviews for tier A units to be white/normal priority (not to mention gilded), but do not for tier B and down (since it's not that important there) where just knowing the platform is enough. As in, we assume that units on the same platform perform comparably if they have similar components choice so as long as we know the breakdown for EVGA GT and have reviews for platform in general it would be a good ground to not gray out it. We considered requiring detailed reviews directly on the unit (or even multiple to account for differences between low and high wattage SKUs) for tier A but things got messy as we don't have enough reviews for nearly as much units we though we have, like a half of Seasonic lineup for example.
I'm already looking into the FEDs with an unnamed reviewer... seems like they sadly used the same feds, so we're likely to detier unless changes occur
But you were talking about regular DQ-M ...
Either way, we have review on DQ-M-V2 from Fantastic, that's why it isn't grayed out and ripple is good enough to keep it in tier A and i have a feeling that it would actually clear ripple limits for gilding too ... Like, i get what are you saying, it doesn't look good components wise, but how formulate that into methodology ? Because sure, we can just quote you, but i'm sure it's not the only PSU out there that performs good in reviews but has components ratings barely enough for it's needs so that possibly could result in some issues, but we can't ask you about each single PSU to determine if they're good enough, can we ? And even in this particular case you don't seem to be overly confident on what CWT's components choice actually resulted in failures you observed either ...
As far of components choice or performance ? Because again, TX-m has 53mV ripple, there are possibility that this were under performing sample but we work with what we have, if GT would endup having >50mV ripple it would go in tier B too, until then we assume that it would be comparable to Cougar GX-F until proven otherwise.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram