*NOTE* THIS IS A SCIENCE PROJECT I NEED YOU GUYS TO HELP ME EVALUATE IT!! (Please post the scores that you think I deserve with this Rubric: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=Y3VzZHNjaG9vbHMub3JnfGNtc19zY2llbmNlX3Jvb21fOHxneDo2NmU4YTJjZjg1YmI1ZmQ2 )
(Currently transferring project, photos etc. over to forum post from google docs.)
PC Cooling: Push vs. Pull, Which Performs Better?
Abstract
I tested the performance differences between Push (Fan is pushing air through the heatsink) and Pull (Fan is pulling air through the heatsink). In order to get temperature results I ran stress tests 3 times and got the averages of each fan setup. I found out a fan pushing air through a heatsink will provide better cooling, than a fan pulling air. Not only can this be the deciding factor between heatsink A or heatsink B, this can be very helpful to first time users wondering where they should mount their fans.
Introduction
In every modern day computer, there is a fan and heatsink to take heat away from the processor. A heatsink is designed to absorb the heat generated from the processor and a fan is used to dissipate the absorbed heat from the heatsink by pulling/pushing the heat away. Without a heatsink, processors would burn out by overheating.
How a Heatsink Works
1) Processor generates heat.
2) Heatsink absorbs generated heat via heatpipes/plating.
3) Heat is brought up to heatsink fins (hot air rises).
4) Fan brings cool air across the heated fins, causing them to become cooler.
5) Absorbed heat in fins are dissipated.
6) Cool air molecules absorb the heated air molecules.
7) Heated air molecules are removed from the case via exhaust.
Materials and Testing Methodology
The system was ran in both overclocked and stock configurations for minimum and maximum temperature readings. Ambient temperature* in the room was a cool 20.5C which did not change between each fan configuration. The processor was overclocked from a stock of 3.3ghz to a speedy 4.5ghz and the voltage was raised from 1.1v to 1.34v. The fan used in this experiment was an Aerocool Shark 120mm Fan, which pulls around 85.5CFM (Cubic Feet Per Minute). The Shark was ran at a max speed of 1600RPM (Revolutions Per Minute) for consistent results and maximum performance.The fan was then mounted in both Push and Pull configurations on the heatsink and temperatures were taken with CPUID’s Hardware Monitor.
To stress the processor and take temperatures, I used the following programs:
Stress Testing**
10 Minute Prime95 Run (Used to check for a stable overclock by stressing processor)
http://www.mersenne.org/freesoft/
10 Passes of Intel Burn In Test (Maximum stress testing for all cores)
http://downloads.guru3d.com/IntelBurnTest-v2.3-download-2047.html
*NOTE* None of these will simulate real world temperatures, these are just used to indicate which fan configuration works BEST for YOU.
Temperature Reading
Hardware Monitor
http://www.cpuid.com/softwares/hwmonitor.html
*Ambient temperature is the “temperature of your surroundings” essentially, room temperature
**In order to generate consistent results, each test was ran 3 times and the average temperature was taken.
Test Hardware
CPU: Intel Core i7-2600k @4.5ghz 1.34v
Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme 4 Gen 3
RAM: 16GB Patriot Sector 7 DDR3
Heatsink: Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO/Aerocool Shark 120mm
Thermal Paste: Arctic Silver 5
Case: CM 690 II Advanced
Power Supply: Antec HCG 620W Power Supply
Graphics Card: Nvidia Geforce GTX 550ti
Aerocool is a reputable company when it comes to fans, their shark series of fans performs very well and is able to generate consistent results when mounted on the Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO.
Aerocool Shark 120mm Fan Compared to Other Fans
Fan mounted on heatsink:
Thermal Paste applied:
Cooler Installed:
Fan Differentiations
Push
Pull
Notice how the fan on the heatsink in the “Pull” photo is flipped? This is what denotes the difference between the Push and Pull methods!
Test System Fan Setup
Fan Setup: 140mm Intake 2x 120mm Outtake 1x 140mm Outtake 2x 120mm Intake
Results
*these for some reason don't work, so click on them for results*
http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/8673/intelburnin.jpg
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/5541/prime95c.jpg
Performance Differences:
Push offers 2C-4C difference in performance when compared to Pull. This is on average a 2.8-5.6% difference between the two. Even though the temperature difference doesn’t seem like a lot, it can be crucial to users who want the best possible temperatures.
As the data shows, when a fan pulls hot air from a heatsink, it will perform better than a heatsink pushing the air. Keep in mind these temperatures will never be reached during real world applications and uses such as gaming and common tasks like internet browsing. However, temperatures will be different between both fan setups regardless of the task being given. Remember, temperatures may be different for everybody, this is because ambient temperature is different in many parts of the world.
Discussion
As shown, temperatures between Push and Pull methods do not vary much! As said before, these do not simulate real world performance. They only show which fan configuration is best and works for you. You may ask yourself, why would someone want to use the Pull method when the Push method works better? Well, there are some cases where RAM Modules get in the way of the fan and block the fan from being installed. That is the only reason why one would use the Pull method instead of the Push method.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank 4Ryan6 of Tomshardware.com for allowing me to use his CFM and airflow results of the Aerocool Shark 120mm fan. I would also like to thank Tomshardware.com and Cooler Master for the photos on airflow. The original Tomshardware.com article on PC Aircooling: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cooling-airflow-heatsink,3053.html Without Tomshardware.com Forums, I would not have been able to come up with the idea for this project! I would also like to thank FinneousPJ and many other people for helping me with ideas and evaluating this project.
(Currently transferring project, photos etc. over to forum post from google docs.)
PC Cooling: Push vs. Pull, Which Performs Better?
Abstract
I tested the performance differences between Push (Fan is pushing air through the heatsink) and Pull (Fan is pulling air through the heatsink). In order to get temperature results I ran stress tests 3 times and got the averages of each fan setup. I found out a fan pushing air through a heatsink will provide better cooling, than a fan pulling air. Not only can this be the deciding factor between heatsink A or heatsink B, this can be very helpful to first time users wondering where they should mount their fans.
Introduction
In every modern day computer, there is a fan and heatsink to take heat away from the processor. A heatsink is designed to absorb the heat generated from the processor and a fan is used to dissipate the absorbed heat from the heatsink by pulling/pushing the heat away. Without a heatsink, processors would burn out by overheating.
How a Heatsink Works
1) Processor generates heat.
2) Heatsink absorbs generated heat via heatpipes/plating.
3) Heat is brought up to heatsink fins (hot air rises).
4) Fan brings cool air across the heated fins, causing them to become cooler.
5) Absorbed heat in fins are dissipated.
6) Cool air molecules absorb the heated air molecules.
7) Heated air molecules are removed from the case via exhaust.
Materials and Testing Methodology
The system was ran in both overclocked and stock configurations for minimum and maximum temperature readings. Ambient temperature* in the room was a cool 20.5C which did not change between each fan configuration. The processor was overclocked from a stock of 3.3ghz to a speedy 4.5ghz and the voltage was raised from 1.1v to 1.34v. The fan used in this experiment was an Aerocool Shark 120mm Fan, which pulls around 85.5CFM (Cubic Feet Per Minute). The Shark was ran at a max speed of 1600RPM (Revolutions Per Minute) for consistent results and maximum performance.The fan was then mounted in both Push and Pull configurations on the heatsink and temperatures were taken with CPUID’s Hardware Monitor.
To stress the processor and take temperatures, I used the following programs:
Stress Testing**
10 Minute Prime95 Run (Used to check for a stable overclock by stressing processor)
http://www.mersenne.org/freesoft/
10 Passes of Intel Burn In Test (Maximum stress testing for all cores)
http://downloads.guru3d.com/IntelBurnTest-v2.3-download-2047.html
*NOTE* None of these will simulate real world temperatures, these are just used to indicate which fan configuration works BEST for YOU.
Temperature Reading
Hardware Monitor
http://www.cpuid.com/softwares/hwmonitor.html
*Ambient temperature is the “temperature of your surroundings” essentially, room temperature
**In order to generate consistent results, each test was ran 3 times and the average temperature was taken.
Test Hardware
CPU: Intel Core i7-2600k @4.5ghz 1.34v
Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme 4 Gen 3
RAM: 16GB Patriot Sector 7 DDR3
Heatsink: Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO/Aerocool Shark 120mm
Thermal Paste: Arctic Silver 5
Case: CM 690 II Advanced
Power Supply: Antec HCG 620W Power Supply
Graphics Card: Nvidia Geforce GTX 550ti
Aerocool is a reputable company when it comes to fans, their shark series of fans performs very well and is able to generate consistent results when mounted on the Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO.
Aerocool Shark 120mm Fan Compared to Other Fans
Fan mounted on heatsink:
Thermal Paste applied:
Cooler Installed:
Fan Differentiations
Push
Pull
Notice how the fan on the heatsink in the “Pull” photo is flipped? This is what denotes the difference between the Push and Pull methods!
Test System Fan Setup
Fan Setup: 140mm Intake 2x 120mm Outtake 1x 140mm Outtake 2x 120mm Intake
Results
*these for some reason don't work, so click on them for results*
http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/8673/intelburnin.jpg
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/5541/prime95c.jpg
Performance Differences:
Push offers 2C-4C difference in performance when compared to Pull. This is on average a 2.8-5.6% difference between the two. Even though the temperature difference doesn’t seem like a lot, it can be crucial to users who want the best possible temperatures.
As the data shows, when a fan pulls hot air from a heatsink, it will perform better than a heatsink pushing the air. Keep in mind these temperatures will never be reached during real world applications and uses such as gaming and common tasks like internet browsing. However, temperatures will be different between both fan setups regardless of the task being given. Remember, temperatures may be different for everybody, this is because ambient temperature is different in many parts of the world.
Discussion
As shown, temperatures between Push and Pull methods do not vary much! As said before, these do not simulate real world performance. They only show which fan configuration is best and works for you. You may ask yourself, why would someone want to use the Pull method when the Push method works better? Well, there are some cases where RAM Modules get in the way of the fan and block the fan from being installed. That is the only reason why one would use the Pull method instead of the Push method.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank 4Ryan6 of Tomshardware.com for allowing me to use his CFM and airflow results of the Aerocool Shark 120mm fan. I would also like to thank Tomshardware.com and Cooler Master for the photos on airflow. The original Tomshardware.com article on PC Aircooling: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cooling-airflow-heatsink,3053.html Without Tomshardware.com Forums, I would not have been able to come up with the idea for this project! I would also like to thank FinneousPJ and many other people for helping me with ideas and evaluating this project.