Exactly. I guess because it’s nvidia. Back during covid those were higher end hot cards that folks were paying over msrp for I think. But now imo there isn’t much point to them. I mean they are still good but with the amount of vram they have and not being able to use nvidias latest features they will become less relevant over time.
Even though a card like the 6700xt is the same generation, I think I remember seeing a video when the 4060ti first came out that the 6750xt, which is essentially a slightly overclocked 6700xt, that the 6750xt was comparable to the newerto 4060ti.
Even though cards like the 6000 series are the same age as the 3070, I’d argue they are more relevant because you can still use the newer features on them. So I would argue they’ve aged better. What’s ironic is that amd in a way is rescuing the older nvidia cards.
Another reason I’m not a fan of nvidia, you sort of alluded to. Over the last few cycles nvidia has tended to lock their newer features to their latest cards. 5000 series is right around the corner but they’ve been able to charge a premium for the 4000 series so it will be interesting to see if they do that again.
In regards to your question, the 3070 at the time was supposed to have been a solid 1440p card and could get expensive. So I suppose especially if they can use and far and frame generation to extend it’s life, if they are able to get the cards at a bargain price as an upgrade to their current card, that would likely be the draw.
But in my opinion there are a lot of amd cards out that are decent and reasonably priced, and with the new arc b580 at $250 entering the market, considering you can get one for that with 12gb vram, then that seems like a good option as well.