Archived from groups: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell (
More info?)
me6@privacy.net wrote:
>>Mine is a Latitude C400. I replaced the stock 20g 4200rpm drive with a
>>60G 5400 rpm and upgraded the ram and run linux for an extra performance
>>boost (running xp under vmware under linux is almost as fast as running xp
>>native
>>for example). I have 640M ram so far in it and if I limit the vmware
>>sessions to 192M each for a couple servers I can have them and X/KDE and
>>kmail/web browser running before it will start to hit swap space. I've
>>found I can get some stuff like sql2000 to run fine under 192m on w2k
>>under a vm session.
>
> Cool!
>
> So you have Linux installed on the laptop.... but use VMWare to run
> "virtual" sessions of Windows XP under that. Correct?
>
> If yes... that's exactly what I was thinking of doing as well
>
> Or..... maybe running virtual sessions of Linux under Win XP....again
> using VMWare.
>
> Which method do you suggest?
I don't run XP very often anymore, only when I need it for lab purposes (or
w2k or w2k3 or slowaris x86 or whatever)
Running windows under vmware under linux works much better. Windows problem
is it wants to keep as much memory free as possible which results in a lot
of hard disk access by both unloading unused code and using the swap file.
Linux will use all available ram before touching the swap file, I never
even hit swap until I open a could vmware sessions at the same time and I
don't even have the Ram maxed in the laptop yet. This keeps the system
much faster because the page in memory isn't sitting in the virtual memory
and the hard disk isn't being accessed all the time.
Running Linux (or anything else) under XP was slower because vmware will
attempt to allocate a bunch of ram for that virtual machine and windows
will page everything else out to try to keep ram on top of that free. The
more I use both I see how much better linux is from a design and how much
worse windows keeps getting as they try to pile more and more on top of a
bad foundation.