[citation][nom]precariousgray[/nom]Come to think of it, every person I've known named Steve has been a self-absorbed, loud-mouthed asshole.[/citation]
Thought about this comment...and wow..it is SOOOOO true. I just never thought about it that way before.... All the Steves I know are exactly as described.
Forget not having HDMI, USB, OLED, Removable Battery, etc...forget all that. One thing that regardless whether the iPad was not equipped with or was, if the iPad was loaded or running with a slimmed down version of OSX, would have been epic. It would have given stiff competition and a run for all the Windows based Tablets. OSX alone on the tampon would have worked! That is all that Apple had to do. Again, iFail.
Another note, Apple really isn't inovative or have magical items. Apple just rehashes what is already out and about in the world and make it look glossy, cute, asthetically superb, and then sells it to the common consumer in a closed environment. Like drones, people buy into the great marketing and purchase Apple products. Why do I say that? Look at the iPad, its an overgrown iPod/iPhone. You want 3G...well we'll charge you "X" $$$ for it. You want Wi-Fi...we'lll charge you $$$ for it etc. Its all a gimmick, ploy, and rehash of the what Apple already has. Reminds me of Nvidia rehashes of its G95 cards. Regardless People will still buy the darn thing because they are oblivious the reality.
Until Apple puts out a tablet running on some form of OSX and with full or close to full functionality of a MAC, its pointless.
But you say "Wait, the iPad is not designed to go aginst Netbooks/PC Tablet markets". Then FTW was it designed to go against? I've read the article above and don't buy into it. It goes back to my comment of rehashing and not inovation. Wut is Apple doing....being inovative in a new type or crossbreed of markets? Wuts sooo inovative when its just an overgrown iPod/iPhone?