To whom it may concern,
As a TWC customer for many years, I've enjoyed the simplicity of T.V. to my homes as well unlimited internet to my home, all through one cable, and all on one bill.
I've been following the trend and certainly the impending reality that sooner or later TWC is going to implement artificial caps on bandwidth usage for heavy users. Ironically, While I don't think I'm a light user, I'm certainly not a heavy user, or abusive user. That said, my TWC internet is used not only for personal use but also for work as I'm home office based. There are times that I'm sure I would break the proposed 40 GB limit. I'm not entirely sure I'm willing to pay for that tier, as well pay for the 100 GB tier if it came to it.
What about your VOIP phone service? Are you going to charge customers not only for the VOIP service but also tack their VOIP bandwidth usage onto their internet consumption?
Your peers in the industry offer higher caps, targetting only the most abusive bandwidth users. Your peers over seas, actually throttle the users connection back to dial up speed when they hit their cap for the billing period -instead of charging them $$ per extra GB. At least offer this choice.
From an article on your impending caps:
"Basing its claims from a trial of 100,000 customers in Beaumont, TX about 14 percent exceeded their cap and had to pay about $19 in overages."
100,000 x 14% = 14,000 customers x $19 average in overages = $266,000 in TWC's pocket just in that market for just one month.
This is nothing but a money grab. If you continue to average 14% and $19 overage per month across other markets, think how profitable this would be in a market with 1 million customers.... over $2.5 million in one month.
Even my cell phone provider offers an unlimited plan, but also a plan for people like my parents. My parents only want the phone for emergency and occasional use, so they pay roughly $20 a month as they hardly use it and they get a very small pool of minutes. Have you considered that maybe the solution all along would be to offer a lower price tier to those types of customers that do simple email and web only?
As of today I have options, if limited. I can drop TWC as my internet provider and go DSL. I might even hope that Verizon comes in with their FIOS or even Sprint with their WIMAX. If I have to drop TWC due to an improperly matched price/GB bandwidth plan, then I finally have the motivation to drop TWC TV service and go Direct TV or one of the other providers. I now pay $44.95 a month for cable based internet, for unlimited usage and I can't see why that should have to change other than to impact TWCs' stock price.
It is truly unfortunate that you are choosing a fight with your customers versus a fight with your potential competitors. It is also unfortunate that you enjoy a near monopoly in regard to the services you provide.
A copy of this email is being forwarded as a letter to my state's Attorney General.
Sincerely
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx