The only reason I bought this is because I want to build a xeon system with these processors
xeon
they are the most powerful processor intel makes. The only chipset that works with them is the e8501 and supports up to 4 and also supports one pci-e x16 slot. Thats over 13Ghz and 32 cores with 4 processors. With the plex you cant deny that it would run some smooth graphics on a 30" lcd. As for not supporting dx10 I am hoping to find a good price for a fx-5600 or fx-4600 on ebay.
ok, I give up... do you realize that your bragging loses more and more credibility... at the first page of the topic, your "killer PC" was a Pentium D 950.... 2 pages later it becomes a quad xeon... what will it be in 2 more pages ? will you buy an IBM BlueGene supercomputer ?
Anyway, just in case you are serious... 4 Xeon CPUs are useless for gaming... almost as useless as a Quadro Plex...
Games just start taking advantage of ONE dual core processor.
And actually, just like Quadro cards, workstation motherboards with Xeon CPUs are not made for gaming... but if you really have money to waste...
EDIT :
I almost forgot... your statement about drivers not influencing performance is definitely stupid... maybe you should take a look at recent articles about Intel IGPs or about the latest Catalyst drivers. I also remember when NV released its 40.xx drivers... my Geforce4's performance increased by about 20%.
In the specific case of Quadro drivers, they don't include the same optimisations as Geforce drivers, so that performance in games will be lower (some games won't even run correctly) and 3D apps like 3dsmax will have a better performance in the viewport, and will be able to use the GPU to speed up rendering (with the NV Gelato rendering engine)
That's it... now, at least, you have learned something about drivers... so your topic wasn't
totally useless...