"We have concluded that no negative correlation exists on Apple's (AAPL) hardware sales when Microsoft launches a new OS. Ironically, we believe new OS launches from MSFT may have even acted as a 'delayed accelerant' to AAPL's computing sales,"
If this is from previous releases, what data are we debating? If they are saying Vista was a delayed accelerant...it's because we all know Vista didn't do very well in the market place and back in XP release days, Apple was much less of a competitor than it is today so whatever data that is from 2001ish is irrelevant. To then place this bit of data as a reason Windows 7, which obviously isn't getting the same reviews as Vista, would make it "time to buy a Mac" asinine. Plus, a simple positive correlation of past Microsoft OS releases is a horrible determinate for Win 7's possible effect on Mac sales. I'm not defending Microsoft here as it could really go either way as to what happens to Apple's sales in the coming months, I'm just flagging Marcus' article as bogus. What is the point of this article if the data is seemingly pulled out of nowhere and hardly relevant? Please refrain from posting "news" articles unless something news-worthy happens instead of just opinions, thanks.