Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.laptops,rec.video,rec.video.dvd.tech (
More info?)
Imagine what a 7200 rpm would do also. There are 10000 rpm advailable
but not an option for us moderate priced individuals. Soon and
probably sooner than you can imagine they will get into solid state
drives and then hold onto your seat.
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:01:32 +0100, "JuniorG"
<tropicalREMOVE_ME@email.it> wrote:
>
>"Mark" <none@none.com> wrote in message
>news:LN6yd.540623$Pl.538215@pd7tw1no...
>> Just wondering if this 60 G hard drive is sufficient to do basic video
>> editing on a laptop and burn to dvd?
>>
>>
>
>I read all the thread, so I know you are mostly concerned about capturing
>DV. Well... 1 hour of full-size, full-framerate DV is about 10GB, which
>means about 2800 kBps ("B" here means byte).
>The 10GB, 4200rpm HDD in my old 700MHz P3 laptop can read and write at about
>12000 kBps (tested with Nero).
>I would hence say thay you most likely won'tr run into any dropped-frame
>problem.
>That's theory. In practice, I made some short DV captures (due to the HDD
>size, I could not capture a whole tape), and noticed some sort of loss of
>"smoothness" on the DV material reversed back on tape. Anyway, I am more
>keen to think that this could be caused by the DV codec, rather than by the
>Hard Disk.
>Anyway, just a couple of weeks ago, I have replaced that HDD with a very
>silent, 80GB, 5400rpm Samsung drive with 8MB cache as opposed to the mere
>128kB of the other, and let me tell you that the leap in performance was
>really amazing. It is like I had replaced the processor with a 1.5GHz one.
>So ultimately, If you have the chance of choosing, don't hesitate and go for
>a 5400rpm drive with a lot of cache. I am 100% sure that you won't be
>disappointed.
>