[citation][nom]tarheels_100[/nom]Denial of the Holocaust is understandably censored because it it unbelievably hurtful to those affected by the Holocaust. Hate-speech like this can be considered a crime in some case because of the emotional harm you can inflict on someone. You may have a scientific theory of why global warming and the hazards of smoking don't exist, but to deny history is insanity.[/citation]
The Turks still deny the Armenian massacre. Why isn't that also against the law?
I think you miss the point completely. If someone wants to deny the genocide of the Jews, why is that so different from other things? You have people claiming Global Warming is a big problem, and that has some serious consequences as well. Who's to say that humans weren't put here to recover some of the carbon that has vanished from the ecosystem?
That's the problem when you start saying what can and can not be said. It's OK to deny the Armenians were massacred, but not the Jews? Are you a Jew? Sure sounds like it. If not, why this one thing? How about all the people that say Hitler wanted to conquer the world. Should be outlaw that, as well, because it's completely untrue, but strangely widely believed? Or how about the 'fact' that the U.S. was militarily defeated in Vietnam. It's untrue, but I hear it a lot. Should we make that illegal? It sure is hurtful to a lot of people, especially the ones that fought there.
Be careful with censorship. It's almost impossible to censor and be consistent with it. It's a fool's errand.