[citation][nom]irh_1974[/nom]So none of these 920,000 people have any other factors affecting them at all?So seeing as the only thing that is making them commit suicide is work stress that explains the reduced rate?Back to the comparison, not the Detroit one, this onehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2259336/Also in Taiwan, also showing figures for the age group under 25, also showing figures for method by jumping, it all matches perfectly.So let's break it down.Outside Foxconn, in the general population, discount all the people who commit suicide for other reasons such as the aforementioned1) guy sets himself on fire for religious reasons1) guy blows his brains out because he is a drug addict1) guy commited a serious crime and is going to be punishedHow many are simply suicide due to work stressIf the number is lower than Foxconn I will concede you are rightIf the number is higher than Foxconn, I expect you to do the sameCan anyone be bothered to actually do research on this subject?[/citation]
You are an asshat of biblical proportions but I will try and explain it to you again....
You are using flawed logic to come to your conclusions.
Now, you want to compare people in the general population who kill themselves from work related stress to people at Foxxconn who kill themselves for the same reason.
By your logic, if less people kill themselves over work related stress AT FOXXCONN than do in the general population, then Foxxconn is exonerated.
THAT is the flaw in your thinking. I will give you that in your comparison, the number at Foxxcon is lower. That doesn't mean Foxxconn is not to blame. Quite the opposite actually. There is no dispersal in Foxxconn data. Same place, same group, same conditions.
That all the sample data in the example you posit regards people who kill themselves from work related stress does not make the comparison you are making valid. You are comparing TAIWAN to a single COMPANY. The sample data from Taiwan comes from people who do not share the commonality of WORKING FOR A SINGLE COMPANY. (BTW - Apples are the red crunchy ones, oranges are the ones you have to peel.)
In the words of Mark Twain... There are lies, damned lies and statistics.
You are a SHILL and a LIAR pal... You twist the data to match what you want to be perceived and compare data that is non-comparable.
Oh, I doubt you will ever concede I am right despite the fact I have PWNED you repeatedly in this debate. You are obviously incapable of that act of humility.
Still waiting on my play money...