snakej
Distinguished
well, I would say is wise to wait for the cards itself, then we can see what they will implement as over clocking tools.
let me google that for you
let me google that for you
😀 All I said was proofs lmao not even 1 bad word, just reread his posts 😉 . And no, I wont hide the reality to readers.
He just cant admit that in a certain position, the 5850 is better than a 470.
Where was I off topic lol? Comparing Fermis OC ability on Air.
😀 All I said was proofs lmao not even 1 bad word, just reread his posts 😉 . And no, I wont hide the reality to readers.
He just cant admit that in a certain position, the 5850 is better than a 470.
Where was I off topic lol? Comparing Fermis OC ability on Air.
😉 I hope you break the 21K barrier. I see you are too confident about getting them to 1Ghz in SLI on Air. Looking forward for your results [:bohleyk:1]
Finally som1 than can give proofs. I think a 470@880Mhz should be around the 5850@1Ghz performance.
OC's don't count unless it is stable enought to;
Beat Crysis start to finish, with no puases/restarts.
Well that's the ideal pipe dream you know a good old repeat of the G80 to G92 that gave the 8800gt performance near the 8800ultra for half the price. Lol i'd just be happy if nvidia could make a card that doesn't need to be crippled and sold. ie the whole not having full 512 "cores" out there.There should be a thread about Fermi refresh preview. If nVidia lowers the TDP,28nm? , they can squeeze more Mhz and enable Full 512 Shader. A 480@512Shaders@850Mhz will beat the 5870 by about 30% and will be near the 5970 performance.