It's amazing how stoopid these amd puppies are!
here is the info from Dr. Pabst's article concerning the P4 and it's performance when tested against a Amd system of his choice.
http://www4.tomshardware.com/cpu/00q4/001206/index.html
here's a quote from that article that amd puppies find offensive.
"Bottom line is that Pentium 4 is indeed able to deliver excellent performance once software has been optimized for it. FlasK is an example showing that Athlon cannot always beat Pentium 4, even when the software has special Athlon-optimizations. My estimate of Athlon's inability to beat Pentium 4 in this test is that Athlon runs into bandwidth limitations with this streaming benchmark. In case of MPEG4-encoding Pentium 4's fast quad-pumped 100 MHz bus plus the dual-Rambus channel memory access of i850 seems superior to Athlon's dual-pumped 133 MHz bus and the 133 MHz DDR-SDRAM memory solution of AMD760. That's why even the best optimizations can't give Athlon enough of a boost to overtake Pentium 4." Dr. Pabst, Toms hardware guide Dec 6, 2000
again the above is quoted from the article entitled "Pentium 4 vs. Athlon - Final Recount"
Yes, this did not sit well with amd fans, and if you follow a thread in these forums about the P4, where tom himself admonishes several amd fanatics! and tom is the hero who they worship!
this was toms fourth and "final say" on the P4 vs Amd issue, but who knows.
I welcome you to read his past articles to see and compare what your choices are, there are a total of four opinionated articles.
- Amd Helpdesk -