Intel CEO Says Windows 8 is Not Fully Ready

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
@belardo

You arent considering that:

1. People and companies already have windows entrenched in their daily lives. It could be as simple as the work computer that you use every day, or the school you grow up attending with Windows computers only. People tend to love familiarity. Unless you are going on the theory that these tablets and iDevices will be taking over and eradicating the desktop computer's role, or even the laptop's role in people's lives.

2. Linux distros have for the longest time said they are striving to make Linux as easy to use, upgrade, and consistant behavior across each company's version. But the truth is, being so fragmented severely hurts the novice and/or general computer buyer from adopting the platform. The openness and freedom of building a distro is the "Linux proliferation movement's" undoing here. IIRC, Steam, which could finally help #3 become somewhat of a thing of the past will only be supporting one distro officially (ubuntu). So, unless Ubuntu becomes the only distro a novice, general computer user ever uses, they may not get any support for certain important apps.

3. Games and Commercial apps. Look, we can debate all day on whether things like GIMP and OpenOffice are anywheres near as good or behave just like Office or Photoshop, but until the commercial standards show up on a linux platform, the novice user just wont want to bother even IF the near impossibilities of #1 & 2 are solved for linux distros.

These are just the obvious reasons why Linux has never made any significant inroads in the novice computer users life. And I'm sorry, but Vista was an even bigger egg in the face for MS than Win8 seems like it ever will be (Vista launch: massive stability issues, whether it actually was MS or driver vendor's fault; slow performance) and still the general computing public made no significant move to Linux. It helped apple a bit, IIRC.
 
*sigh* really people, it literally takes one button press to get to the regular desktop from metro. you'd be a fool to buy 7 at $99 vs. 8 at $40 (or $15) simply because you got a problem with metro...
 
[citation][nom]belardo[/nom]You are SO right. My Win8 Core2Duo notebook with an HD running Win8 powers up faster than my Core2Quad with an SSD.Once running... doesn't matter. Kuddos still. Imagine how much faster it would be without two UI running at the same time. Its still not WORTH it to many of us. I'm still buying another $140 OEM Win7Pro for my next upgrade rather than the $40 deal... which is a waste of $40 IMHO.[/citation]

each to their own i guess, it doesn't bother me since i kinda like having the full screen news apps over the websites.

still even with the metro ui in win 8 it is still faster then win 7 & is cheaper so im not too sure why there is a problem, though im sure some time in the next few months someone will find a way to remove it.
 
[citation][nom]leaderWON[/nom]*sigh* really people, it literally takes one button press to get to the regular desktop from metro. you'd be a fool to buy 7 at $99 vs. 8 at $40 (or $15) simply because you got a problem with metro...[/citation]
You know how people tend to feel about change...no matter how slight the change. When the change is seen as highly unnecessary and she who is doing the changing is doing little to alter that perception with the masses (how many TV spots have you seen touting how great Windows 8's new UI and features are...can MS not afford a 60s spot?) you end up with the perspectives we have.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.